Safer Saw- Juniorgirlblog

1A. Manufacturers

Have you ever cut wood with a blade and  accidentally  your hand get cut by it , if not then the blade will stop and actually you will get a nick instead of taken off your whole hand .

1B. Its fact that when running your hand through a blade, the blade will actually stop.

1C. The claim above is actually right and it proved by the video where I took this information from.  If you tried it without visual proof and actually seeing someone doing it , it will be messy . But because of the visual proof this cause it to be very persuasive.

2A. Customers

Bosch was hold liable for making a bad business decision that would cost them lots money seems a bit unreasonable .

2B. It would be a bad decision for Bosch to install the saw shop in all of its product , so they shouldn’t be held accountable for anything.

2C. one claim that seem accurate , ” Voluntary standards are working to enhance table  saw safety “.  This statement sees accurate because they are trying to make it better so no more accident which cost them money.

3A. Personal Lawyer

Even though saw safety had been around for many years, not all manufacturers that have table saw adopted it.

3B. It stated that Saw Stop  has been available and evaluating how much not all manufacturers have adopted it.

A05: Proposal+5 – Baritonemusicman

For my research essay I will be claiming that music educators are the best therapist the school system doesn’t know they have.

School Counselor Careers

careersinpsychology.org  go to careers then click counselors then scroll down to school counselor careers

The Essential Content of the Article: In order to truly know what it means to be a school counselors its important to know what the job description is as well as what it takes to be a good one. This article devotes its entirety to just that from paragraphs on what is a school counselor to what it takes to become one. It also discusses their importance why they are necessary to the school system. 

For my research essay I will be examining Music Education in the public school system, its importance to the development of students and how it is actually detrimental to students to remove music from the school curriculum.

The Importance of Music Education In the Public Schools

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.rowan.edu/docview/304823828?pq-origsite=summon

The Essential Content of the Article: This article devotes entire chapters to the cognitive effects that music education have on students. Each are backed by research and test done to prove how music is able to do so. As well as discussing why it is that we are losing these programs and how we reclaim what has been lost.

What it Proves: I plan to use this information to pull concrete examples of how exactly music education actually aids the school system and how getting rid of it we show bad results across the board.

Balancing the scales of music: A quantitative study of music education and academic achievement in a southeastern state public school

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.rowan.edu/docview/219970788?pq-origsite=summon

The Essential Content of the Article: This article is a dissertation of findings of the differences between students who had music education and those who didn’t showing how they differed in scoring on standardized testing and the learning advantages.

What it Proves: I will using the findings of each study to make my case of how removing music education is going to cause adverse affects to students.

The Importance of music Education in public schools

http://www.cnn.com/2011/SHOWBIZ/Music/05/31/music.education.cake.difiore/index.html

The Essential Content of the Article: This article gives a first person view of how music education experiences were able to be manifest in real life situations. By bringing this article in its less about the numbers and brings in real life perspective from someone who has experience with music education.

What it proves: By using this article I will be able to draw from the real life perspective of students who have had thru the music education process. By having first person recollection its creates more reliability giving a face to the studies.

The Consequences of Curtailing Music Education

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/tsr/dudamel-conducting-a-life/the-consequences-of-curtailing-music-education/

The Essential Content of the Article: In this article it discusses the adverse effects that are occurring due to the cut of music education programs. It also delves into how in most cases the programs are lost by lower-income or urban communities due to funding. And those who are on the higher bracket are less likely to suffer due to being able to put their kids in private study but that isn’t always an option for those in a lower-income bracket

What is Proves: In using this sources I’ll be able to delve into the adverse affects that taking away music education will create further differences between brackets of income. By taking away theses programs those who live in lower-income brackets are less likely to be able to continue their studies meaning they wouldn’t be receiving the same advantages those whom continue on are able to receive. Creating inequality in learning styles because a source has been taken away from them.

What if every child had access to music education from birth? | Anita Collins | TEDxCanberra

The Essential Content of the Article: During this Speech Ainta Collins discusses of findings of neuroscientist of how music is able to have so much of effect on children growing up. Giving visual understanding to how much brain activity music education is able to accomplish all at once.

What this Proves: I will be using her finding for giving a visual outlook on brain activity as well as giving in-depth examples of how musicians have highly developed memory when put against those who didn’t have that musical advantage.

 

 

E03: Critical Reading – Tiggs18

“Sometimes I can’t do the laundry,” Brannan explains, reclining on her couch. “And it’s not like, ‘Oh, I’m too tired to do the laundry,’ it’s like, ‘Um, I don’t understand how to turn the washing machine on.’ I am looking at a washing machine and a pile of laundry and my brain is literally overwhelmed by trying to figure out how to reconcile them.”

  • seems as if she can not control her thoughts or focus on doing any one thing because of what we can imagine would be some type of stress disorder
  • basic things that everyone does can not be performed

 

The Army has rules about that sort of thing now. Now if you’re knocked unconscious, or have double vision, or exhibit other signs of a brain injury, you have to rest for a certain period of time, but that rule didn’t go into effect in theater until 2010, after Caleb was already out of the service.

  • a rule was put in finally which should have happened awhile ago
  • these injuries seem like something you don’t think are bad but in reality are worse then some bigger injuries can be
  • trauma is a real thing that affects people in serious ways and to keep them out there after an injury is shameful
  • time finally came where they want to make sure people are alright

 

“I guess we’re just used to dealing with people with more severe injuries,” a VA nurse once told Brannan upon seeing Caleb.”

  • this goes to show that nurses can not see the ptsd at first like they can see other injuries in which are seeable from the eye
  • sometimes it seems from this as if the nurses don’t really know how to deal with trauma like this

 

Her schoolmate said something mean. Maybe. Katie doesn’t sound sure, or like she remembers exactly. One thing she’s positive of: “She just made me…so. MAD.” Brannan asks Katie to name some of the alternatives. “Walk away, get the teacher, yes ma’am, no ma’am,” Katie dutifully responds to the prompts. She looks disappointed in herself.

  • she goes to school
  • doesn’t seem to be able to understand the tone in peoples voice
  • has her own emotions and not certain with others so is confused when someone doesn’t sound like herself

 

In cases where children themselves need treatment, these VA officials recommended that parents find psychologists themselves, though they note “this is a good time [for the VA] to make partners with the community so we can make good referrals.” Or basically: “You’re on your own,” says Brannan.

  • seems as if the kids who seem to have signs are not being taken in because they are not actually on duty
  • they only help active on duty people that show signs

Polio Notes- thathawkman

  • Between the age 0-5, children are more vulnerable to the disease
    • Their immune system isn’t as developed
    • Not as good with defecation
    • Can easily spread through water. Highly susceptible to people inside the water with the disease
    • Intake the disease through the mouth
  • Used to be a million a year that would catch polio which can vary from paralyzation to death
  • Vaccines are used now to treat polio and reduce the amount of polio in the population
  • If irradiated once, it’s gone forever as there is no one left to spread the disease
  • Not as easy to get everyone in the population to get immunization
  • Armed Conflict stifles polio immunization
  • Prevention could be futile if introduced again
  • There are a couple of 100 of cases of polio in the world a day
  • The world has gotten rid of Small Pox and irradicated it from the world
  • Distrust in vaccination leads to lack of faith and resistance to get the vaccination
  • One day vaccination are very effective
    • The vaccine is in liquid form, with any dosage. produces anti-bodies to combat
    • Massive amounts of volunteers who don’t need training go to administer the vaccine to vaccinate a lot of people simultaneously
  • 3 times in different times for complete immunization
  • Expensive to administrate the one-day vaccination
  • Vaccination cost 8 cents a piece per child
  • Needs to be refrigerated, transportation
  • The lack of a threat can cause herd immunity to be obsolete

 

Practice Opening

Though it is quite sad, there is no guarantee that the threat of polio will be eradicated from the world in 20 years unless desperate and militant measures are taken. With massive distrust from international affairs to paranoia about the vaccination itself, it would be hard to believe that one day every country in the world would be on board administrating a vaccine that still may kill children. Even in first world countries where there is a lot of education about vaccination, there is conflict on whether or not a child should be required to be vaccinated as it may cause autism or the minute chance of giving the disease while vaccinating . If there is a solid population of non-vaccinated people, the disease will always be prevelent so it makes sense to vaccinate. Yet the paranoia about the vaccination will always be prevalent. Even as the years go by and a new 100% safe vaccine is made, distrust from other countries such as Pakistan and the suspicion of the vaccine relating to CIA agents to general distrust about a vaccine for a disease that is not prevalent in the area will stray those areas away from peacefully administering the vaccine. Since perception tends to be more prevalent than the truth, there is no guarantee for the

 

Polio Notes-yeezygod21

  • In our age we have tamed polio of spreading.
  • The technology and science is far superior to Modern Age times.
  • The virus is introduced in the mouth and comes out in the intestines.
  • The disease targets primarily children younger than 5 and can lead to partial and sometimes fatal paralysis.
  • Polio has immortality, simply can be tamed
  • Polio breakout can happen in any country
  • 4 countries India, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan
  • Vaccination is an option, not necessarily a demanding choice.
  • When comes to vaccination many people tend to not take it because of what the analytics say if 99 percent of the world is taking the vaccine , then there should not be any concerns.
  • Children are becoming the consumers for the vaccine as time progress
  • Vaccinations is costly for many millions
  • Spend the money to save lives not kill. The usage of inactive vaccination will be positive outlook.
  • Even immunizing people there is no solution for Polio; basically we are stalling until we find a way to kill completely
  • Polio does not seem a concern to many people
  • More than 100 children are exposed to Polio and they can spread it, which a great solution is more and more adults and children should take vaccination.
  • Doctors need to find a uncostly solution
  • Many conspiracies have been brought to attention of Polio
  • In 6 of the 9 autistic children, either the parent or a physician had linked the onset of developmental regression with the receipt of the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella
  • A small number should not make a difference if vaccine is dangerous or not.

 

 

As we know diseases remain in earth’s soil while the human race is living on it. The task in hand is very complex. Polio will forever continue even though we are not exposed to it now. People such as adults and children will be encountering on daily basis when the time comes. The science needs to improve as we move towards the future to establish a safe way for ones who get exposed. Polio is simply can be tamed as of now but all we have to do is come together as a world to fight off  even though large amounts of money is involved.

Critical Reading- jsoccer5

“It’s kind of hard to understand Caleb’s injuries. “

What makes it so hard? There is nothing in this statement to support the fact that this is hard, its just a blank accusation that the reader isn’t smart enough or knowledgeable enough to understand Caleb’s injuries. She doesn’t say what all his injuries are so she can’t say they are all hard to understand. If it is hard to understand them then how does she understand them? In this sense she says Caleb’s injuries but doesn’t specify as to if it’s all or some of them making it seem as if all his injuries are complex and too hard for anyone to understand. What if he has other injuries other then just this mental illness. Lots of time men in the Military have physical injuries as well as mental. Are those just as hard to understand? By her making injuries plural it states there is more than one injury and since this article is only talking about his PTSD it leaves it open to assume there are other issues he is handling which may be making his PTSD more intensified and harder to handle.

“Even doctors can’t say for sure exactly why he has flashbacks, why he could be standing in a bookstore when all of a sudden he’s sure he’s in Ramadi, the pictures in his brain disorienting him among the stacks, which could turn from stacks to rows of rooftops that need to be scanned for snipers. “

While doctors cannot say why he is having them, they saying something which is most likely suggesting reasons behind why he is having them based off their medical knowledge and history in the field. It doesn’t say the doctors don’t have any idea of what causes them it just says they don’t know for sure suggesting that they do have some idea, its just not exactly what Caleb wants to hear or maybe hasn’t been medically proven yet. There is also no exact number of doctors who can’t say exactly what causes this. The article just says doctors, which is plural so we know it is at least two. There is also no evidence that these doctors are specialized in this field, for all we know it could be his primary general physician. If he is having flashbacks so severed he can’t remember where he is then maybe he should be seeing a specialist. She then contradicts her self by basically describing what triggers his PTSD by saying that the rows of books remind him of the roof tops on Ramada. As someone who struggles from PTSD I don’t always know why I get flashbacks sometimes and not others but I am aware that certain things will trigger my PTSD, such as crowds so therefor I try to avoid them and I am sure to have methods to handle these problems if for some reason a certain crowd randomly triggers me. While doctors can’t say for sure what is causing Caleb’s they can help him and his family recognize his triggers, such as tall rows of similar items, and help him come up with ways to handle the flashbacks the same way doctors in my life have.

“Sometimes he starts yelling, and often he doesn’t remember anything about it later. “

There are many people out there who when upset and yelling they don’t remember what they say after the fact. While this could be a side effect of PTSD it is not only directly related to PTSD. Maybe he has consumed alcohol, or is on some type of drug that doesn’t help him remember well. How do we know that he doesn’t remember anything? Maybe he pretends not to remember so he does not have to face the possibility of being embarrassed or having to deal with the problem at hand. There is zero evidence in this statement that he is yelling about something war related, maybe he is just mad and upset about other aspects of his life.

“They don’t know exactly why it comes to him in dreams, and why especially that time he picked up the pieces of Baghdad bombing victims and that lady who appeared to have thrown herself on top of her child to save him only to find the child dead underneath torments him when he’s sleeping, and sometimes awake. “

Who is they? Is she referring to the doctors he works with? Again she states they, I am assuming she is referring to the doctors but I am unsure, don’t know why exactly he is having these flashbacks insinuating that they have some theories as to why and have shared those theories with Caleb but have told him it could be many different reasons. She then describes a very vivid incident that Caleb has encounters while overseas. By this women being able to describe the event so vividly it seems as if Caleb has described this event to her in detail, insinuating that Caleb has expressed this event as one very memorable event to be that is constantly bothering him and significant in his life. She then goes on to say that this event not only bothers him in his sleep but also when he is awake, making is seem that he isn’t only having flashbacks in his sleep, so the fact that the doctors can’t exactly figure out why he does it in his sleep doesn’t mean much as they are actually looking at a much bigger picture of why he is having these flashbacks at all and what is triggering them. Sleeping during them is only one aspect to the much larger and involved issue at hand.

“They don’t know why some other guys in his unit who did and saw the same stuff that Caleb did and saw are fine but Caleb is so sensitive to light, why he can’t just watch the news like a regular person without feeling as if he might catch fire. “

By saying they don’t know what makes him different from other guys in the unit who are fine is like saying we don’t know why this apple is bruised and this other one is half red half yellow. Everybody is effected by situations and life experiences differently so you cannot compare the two. Also it says some of the guys in the unit which could mean two things. One being that they only spoke to a few guys in the unit, which could be really only two other guys, and compared those people to Caleb, while they  didn’t talk to all of the guys in the unit. It could also mean that only some of the guys in the unit weren’t effected but everyone else in the unit has the exact effect, or similar issues as Caleb.She then throws in the fact that Caleb is sensitive to light. This part of the sentence has nothing to do with the other people in the unit being effected or not, it just says they are fine and Caleb is not, nothing about other people in the unit being effected by light. It really truly doesn’t make sense and should either be another sentence completely or not mentioned at all. It is almost as if the writer has used this to change focus on the fact that the beginning of the sentence is being presented as fact when it has nothing to back it, no studies shown. As she goes on to explain the light issue she says the news causes him to feel like he is going to catch on fire. Why is it just the news and not all of TV shows. While yes TV is light, which would make sense for him to be sensitive to watching TV, it makes no sense as to this relating to him to having trouble watching the news and nothing else. It seems as if the news is a trigger all into its self. Maybe the type of news brings back memories. We don’t know what type of news they are referring to we just know its the news, maybe its world wide news which is always showing war scenes and makes sense for it to bother his as he is a war veteran. Also why does he feel he is going to catch on fire? Is it that its so bright he feels its like the sun is about to touch him? Or is it that while he was active duty serving that he almost caught on fire and watching news about war brings him back to that moment? How many times has watching the news resulted in him feeling like he is going to catch on fire? Maybe that incident has only happened once, and if so that particular scene on the news probably triggered him back to something that happened involving catching on fire. This sentence is all over the place, spewing out random facts that don’t help each other make a valid point and distract the reader from being able to analyze there is nothing backing the beginning of the sentence about how other men in the unit aren’t effected.

“Some hypotheses for why PTSD only tortures some trauma victims blame it on unhappily coded proteins [11], or a misbehaving amygdala [12]. “

What hypotheses are these and where did she get them from. While she does create links to what those two medical issues are she does not refer to where she got these facts from, making it not an actual fact just simply a claim. She also says these hypotheses blame these medical issues for PTSD torture. To start blame is a very strong phrase and most of the time is used when you disagree with something. When I think of blame I think of a child doing something wrong and blaming it on their sibling. By saying these medical scientific hypotheses place these other medical issues at fault for PTSD it makes it seem like if you have PTSD they will just blame it on something else and not on the fact that the person with PTSD went through something traumatic. Also the fact that they say torture is a strong statement too. By saying PTSD only tortures some trauma victims its saying that some trauma victims have PTSD but it doesn’t effect them so they must not have these other medical issues. From personal experience with PTSD over time the triggers and effects of it dwindle away so this claim is also saying it tortures some but not others but never discloses how recent those trauma victims have had their incident or how far along in treatment they are in regards to their incident, not to mention trauma victims could lose their memory making it so that they just don’t remember what happened and can’t be effect by it. Once again comparing some people to another, even just one person to another person isn’t a fair evaluation as not everyone is effect the same way with life events.

“Family history, or maybe previous trauma.”

This sentence doesn’t really make much sense alone however if I refer it back to the previous sentence it seems that it is referring to more reasons why PTSD can effect some people and not others. If some victims have family history of mental health issues that will absolutely play a roll into the effects some have of their PTSD. They may also have other medical issues making small upsets into larger things because they are simply just dealing with too much at one time. The fact that some of these people may have experienced previous trauma would absolutely effect how they handle things. If someone has multiple challenging life events happen they will struggle more at coping as there is more to cope with. Again these are both reason why someone cannot compare people. Yes all of the fruit in the basket may be apples but they all come from different places and all taste and look different. If you are going to compare people it should be scientifically done with everyone in the group having similar outside factors such as everyone involved in the study has no mental illness in their family history and have never been exposed to previous trauma and all needed to have witnessed the same life altering event. By eliminating outside factors it would be easier for doctors to understand why some people are effected and others are not.

 

Visual Rewrite – theshiftyyman

  • 0:00-0:01 The Ad starts of in an ambulance with two injured men inside along with a male and a female EMT. One of the men is more seriously hurt and is being attended to by the EMT’s. The camera then focuses in on the man who is less injured’s face. He looks extremely upset as if he knew the man on the table and he was close. Their injuries look like ones that would be consistent with a car accident.
  • 0:03-0:08 The man on the table beings to die as the EMT’s struggle to save him. The less injured man begins to calm down slightly and starts talking to himself. He seems to be trying to put his mind at ease about something. He then begins to sob once again even more than before. His body language suggested that he was talking to try and forgive himself or justify something he did. He then realized that he couldn’t and began to cry again.
  • 0:09-0:16 The man begins to cry and he puts his face in his hand. The EMT’s then look at up at him and stop working on the man on the table. The look at him surprised. It looked like he said something that offended them since they stopped working. The EMT’s were focused on their patient, but then in response to what that less injured man said they stopped working and looked at him. The male EMT then said something back to the less injured man and after he said it his body relaxed and he seemed calm. Now it seemed that what the man said put the EMT’s at ease.
  • 0:17-0:19 The patient on the table who was dying sits up and begins to speak. This event that would clearly be shocking and perhaps frightening doesn’t seem to stun anybody in the ambulance. The man shot up and was miraculously healed, and unless one of the EMT’s was Jesus this would be am upsetting event. This could also suggest that the mans injuries weren’t to serious because of what the other less injured man said. Maybe what the less injured man said had something to do with the seriousness of the accident they were in.
  • 0:22-0:25 After the man has been sitting up the camera focuses on the faces of everyone and there is a general sense of calmness coming from their facial expressions. It seems like everything is okay or that nothing really happened. The more injured mans face is still badly cut and he is wearing a neck brace. He is however talking and is very calm and sitting upright. Then suddenly the man drops down on the table again and the EMT’s again being to work on him. All of the sudden he’s dying again and the less injured man is again crying hysterically. It seems like the situation is back to reality and everything that is supposed to happen is happening all over again.
  • 0:26-0:31 The less injured man is crying again and the other man is dying, while the EMT’s try and save his life. As everything is going down a message pops up that says, “Buzzed driving is drunk driving”. This message clarifies that everything that went down was a result of drunk driving. It can be assumed that the less injured man was the driver, while the other man was a passenger. The less injured man was crying out of guilt because he was drunk driving, and his friend got hurt as a result. He must have said something along the line of “i was just buzzed” when he spoke midway. Then the EMT’s must have responded and gave the impression that the more injured man was fine. Then that same man sat up to indicate that he really was. However this was not the reality, and once this was realized every part of the situation went back to normal. It was to prove that just because you were just buzzed doesn’t mean that the consequences are any less severe. That is where the add gets all of its power and meaning.

“Let’s Take Action”

Stone Money Rewrite – theshiftyyman

Stone Money Rewrite – theshiftyyman

Money isn’t something that has worth it is something that has value. Any kind of currency that is used to purchase something has no worth it is a place holder  for something that does have worth. There in lies the value of money, it can be traded for something because it represents something of worth. The US dollar and most currencies are backed by a precious metal such as gold or silver. The gold or silver is what has the worth and that is why it’s accepted. However it is now believed by many that the US has no gold or silver to back the money. Now it’s a mystery why the US dollar is still accepted.

The answer to that mystery could lie within an ancient civilization on an island in the pacific called Yap. The Yapese people used a currency called Rai which is literally just big circular stones. These stones were’t backed by anything however they were accepted as a currency. The value of them lied within nothing other than the fact that people wanted them. They were big shiny special things that people would trade anything for depending on the size. The Rai were acquired by explorers who would travel to an island far away and would bring home huge chunks of limestones shaped like circles with a hole through the center. The wholes through the center were to help with transporting the large stones. The stones increase in value based of of size, how hard it was to get, and the number of lives lost while retrieving it.

Basically, the reason why any money has value now is because other people want it. The value of money is mostly if not all the way based off of how much other people wanted it. This is why you can literally trade a big rock for a car. If the other person wants a big rock that rock has value in the form of a car. Money is a very strange thing and it’s a strange concept that we even need it. In the end money is worthless, but something will always have value as long as it is desirable to somebody.

Works Cited

Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” The Island of Stone Money(1991): 3-7. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.

Moffatt, Mike. “Why Does Money Have Value?” About Education. About Education, n.d. Web.

“Stone Money.” BBC News. BBC, n.d. Web.

Summaries- Baritonemusicman

 

  1. It seems counterintuitive that an article would discourage shoppers from purchasing from companies that claim to be “buy one, give one”. Meaning that by making your purchase you would be giving to those who were less privileged. Toms the company claims that for every pair of shoes and/or pair of glasses purchased, will result in the company donating to someone from a developing country. But what isn’t well researched is if the aid is going to the proper person and weather it’s creating an adverse affect on the community’s economy. In the type of aid given to these developing companies they sometimes end up doing more damage than help. Such as when a Tom’s employee made the claim that by giving shoes they were able to “promote education because children are often barred from entering schools barefoot. But after speaking to one of the core Ethiopian giving partners (International Orthodox Christian Charities) it was discovered that they were giving shoes in school to students who already owned shoes. So the intent was there but the aid wasn’t getting to the proper people. In sight of this information when attempted to research thru the Toms website there is no clear way of how their buy-one, give one process works. There is little to no information allowing the consumer to know where their money is going. Though they seem to be doing great work in attempting to help they need to make it clear to their customers what it is they are attempting to achieve and how exactly their going about doing it.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2012/05/toms-shoes-buy-one-give-one2.

2. It seems counterintuitive that CrossFit has shown so many amazing results in its participants but is actually unsafe. Though the CrossFit is able to pack a huge workout in a short amount of time with its combination of interval training and weight lifting its cons out weigh the pros. In taking a survey of 132 people it was shown that 97 of the original 132 reported getting hurt during CrossFit training, most involving the shoulders and spine. In another case there was a condition called rhabdomyolysis, which is where muscle fibers are pushed to the point of breaking down causing them to enter the bloodstream leading to life-threatening kidney damage. Because of cases like this it shows that the workouts of CrossFit directly tied to the injuries and causing damage to participants bodies. Which has then led to multiple lawsuits being filed not only against CrossFit but those who were researchers and advocates of the positive affects of it. Those who part take in CrossFit tend to embrace the fact that CrossFit pushes the body to an extreme measure forcing it to adapt. But in doing so they’ve been deemed unsafe and held responsible for the injuries and health problems.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/dandiamond/2015/05/11/is-crossfit-good-for-you-what-60-minutes-didnt-say/#3d61a0873845

3. It seems counterintuitive that Gatorade is both beneficial but yet at the same time can be a detriment to health depending on the context. Gatorade is pushed as a sports drink, and according to their research they found that in drinking Gatorade athletes were able to replace lost electrolytes, also bring carbohydrates and hydration into the mix all in one drink. Gatorade also claims their sport drink is able to hydrate the body better than water due to their additional ingredients. Which has also been backed by a report from University of California, Berkley claiming that sports drink might be better for children and athletes that engage in prolonged, vigorous physical activity for over an hour, especially in hot conditions. But where lies the problem is there are those ingesting this product who have not been active or active enough for at least an 60 to 90 minutes. So in doing so their body are taking in an excessive amount of calories that it doesn’t need.  In giving this to kids Berkeley researchers have stated that the sugars in these sports drinks could be contributing to the child obesity epidemic. As people who don’t need to continue to ingest this product it causes weight gain and extra sodium which then will lead to higher blood pressure. What needs to be done in this case is individuals really need to asses what it is that they are consuming and/or allowing their children to consume.

http://www.healthline.com/health/food-nutrition/is-gatorade-bad-for-you#2

Polio notes- juniorgirlblog

  • It spread through many countries , but children are more vulnerable to this disease then adults. It enters the mouth then comes out as poop, which makes it very likely that a younger child will receive it.
  •  Adults are able to fight this off more then children . The places that are affected by the disease, they don’t seek out for anyone to help get cure.
  • Polio requires more vaccination of children between the ages of 0-5 because their immune system is weak.
  • Polio spread easy unless the population is vaccinated and sanitary.
  • Polio eventually shut down the body and may cause someone to become paralysis.
  • By having polio may cause someone to become really lazy.

Practice opening:

Polio is like a disease that can be cure but it may take sometime. In the next 10 years the disease most likely will disappear, but the the people who suffer from polio is mainly poor and live in a poor country. In order for the disease to stop , you might need to but 3-4 drops of vaccine on people tongues and sanitize the environment.