White Paper- Phillyfan321

Hypothesis: The 7% New Jersey sales tax should not be lowered because it is not a regressive tax that affects the poor more than it does the upper class.

On January 1, 2017 the New Jersey Sales tax will go down to 6.875% from the current 7%. I do not believe this tax will benefit lower income families. The sales tax in New Jersey only applies to luxury items, not essentials that people need to survive.

Some items that are exempt from the New Jersey sales tax:

  • All canned food (vegetables,soups meat), except pet food.
  • Bottled water without flavoring
  • Cereal
  • Bandades
  • Juices with more than 50% juice
  • Raw vegetables
  • Vitamins
  • Deli Meat
  • Bread
  • Milk
  • Prescription Drugs
  • Aspirin
  • Clothing

The current sales tax law only applies to luxury items. Some examples of taxable items in New Jersey Include:

  • Alcoholic beverages
  • Tobacco (cigarettes, tobacco rolling papers, Cigars)
  • Prepared food (restaurant meals, fast food)
  • Pet food
  • Nail Polish

Some States do have a regressive sales tax because they do tax grocery items (North Carolina, Alabama, Kansas). The difference from these States sales tax is that they tax basic needs, the poorer citizens of these States have to pay the sales tax on basic goods while in New Jersey, they do not pay the sales tax on basic goods.

Most food that can be bought with SNAP benefits are sales tax exempt. Some examples of items that can be bought with SNAP benefits that are tax free are:

  • Bread
  • Fruits and vegetables
  • Milk
  • Meat
  • Canned items

Someone who relies on these SNAP benefits for food will not have to pay anymore for their basic groceries. While there are some items that can be bought with an EBT card, like soda which subject to the New Jersey sales tax,  but soda is not an essential item.

Working Hypothesis 1

I do not believe that the New Jersey Sales Tax should be lowered because it is a fair tax and does not unfairly affect the poor.

Working Hypothesis 2

The sales tax is a regressive tax on the lower tax and it affects them more than it does the upper class.

2.

Cause/Effect

  • If the sales tax is lowered then New Jersey will collect less sales tax revenue.
  • If the sales tax is lowered then prepared meals will cost a little less after taxes than they currently do  now.

Definition/Class

  • I may need to clarify more what an EBT and SNAP benefits are.
  1. I feel that my thesis and arguments for my claim are good. I have examples and facts to prove my claims. Writing an essay about this claim should be easy for me. I have good sources to back up my claim also.

Safer Saws – anonymous

1A. Manufacturers

“When you’re cutting wood, if you accidentally run your hand into the blade, it’ll stop it so quickly that you just get a little nick instead of maybe taking some fingers off.”

1B. An ordinary saw would cause severe injury if your hand touched the blade, but this saw is different. It can save your fingers.

1C. This statement is factual, the blade will stop when touched by your finger.

1D. The statement by itself has no factual evidence and is casual at best. The only reason I know the sentence is factual is from the video that is part of the article.

2A. Customers

“To hold Bosch liable for not making a bad business decision that would cost them lots of money seems a bit unreasonable if not ludicrous.”

2B. Pinning the blame on Bosch for not incorporating this new technology is not fair considering it would be detrimental to their business.

2C. This a statement of opinion concluding holding Bosch liable is “unreasonable.”

2D. While poorly worded and not quite a rhetoric this is an opinion. The only problem I have with this statement is the jump from “a bit unreasonable” to “ludicrous”. The point he is trying to make becomes convoluted and a lot less stable when he tries to equate unreasonable to ludicrous.

3A. Industry Spokespeople

“SawStop is currently available in the marketplace to any consumer who chooses to purchase it.”

3B. SawStop can be purchased by any customer who wants it.

3C. This is a factual opinion, stating that anyone who feels the need to purchase this additional safety measure.

3D. This sentence is very subtly hinting at the fact that if the consumer wants to get the additional safety of SawStop it is “available” for purchase.

4A. Consumer Safety Advocates

“As I have stated many times before—and as is now reflected in the agency’s new strategic plan—one of the CPSC’s primary goals is a commitment to prevention.”

4B. The CPSC has a strategic plan which includes the goal to prevent future table saw injuries.

4C. This is a well versed clinical response to the safety advocates core values and goals.

4D. They claim they have gone over this many times and it should be common knowledge. Although they go on to say the agency is incorporating a “new strategic plan”. Is this new plan different than the original? At the end they do instill their primary goal is still the same, “commitment to prevention.”

5A. Injured Plaintiffs

“Wec says his permanent and “traumatic injury” could have been prevented if Bosch and its competitors had not rejected and fought against the safety technology.”

5B. This is a really opinionated statement, quoting “Wec”, saying his injury could of been prevented if only Bosch had not denied the new technology.

5C. This is a opinionated view from a victim that is obviously very biased. It sets out to demonize the big corporation that is “Bosch”.

5D. This claim is paraphrased and can be easily disputed. It gives off a personal and clearly biased vibe, and to me seems almost phony. There is no evidence and no face to put on the injury so for all intensive purposes its a fairy-tale.

6A. Personal Injury Lawyers

“Although SawStop safety technology has been around for more than ten years, not all table saw manufacturers have adopted it.”

6B. Although SawStop safety technology has been around for more than ten years, not all table saw manufacturers have adopted it.

6C. This is a clear cut statement verbalizing how long SawStop has been around and letting the reader know not everyone has adopted it.

6D. Not the most persuasive statement ever made but what it lacks in details it makes up for in simplicity. Sometimes a clear cut statement can be more influential than a million different metaphors and statistics.

7A. Government Officials

“The benefits of improving table saw safety clearly outweigh the costs.”

7B. There are many benefits of improving the table saw, cost should not be an issue.

7C. This is a opinionated claim. It insinuates that incorporating this new technology is a situation of morality. We shouldn’t negotiate price when it can save someone from traumatic injury.

7D. Again, not very well defined in the wording and reasoning. What are the benefits? What are the costs?

8A. News Reporters

“But as well as the technology works, the major tool companies have failed to put this kind of device on any of their table saws — even eight years after Gass offered to license it to them.”

8B. This technology is proven to work yet major tool companies refuse to use it, even after Gass offered them the license.

8C. This is another opinionated claim backed by some fact. The blame is directed toward these tool companies suggesting they are neglectful for not accepting the license.

8D. This statement is persuasive enough but gives no statistics to help convince the reader the companies are indeed neglectful. “Failed” is a strong word and was used pretty tactfully in this claim.

Polio Notes- brobeanfarms

-More than 100 children are exposed to Polio and they can spread it, which a great solution is more and more adults and children should take vaccination.

-The disease targets primarily children younger than 5 and can lead to partial and sometimes fatal paralysis.

-Polio requires more vaccination of children between the ages of 0-5 due to their weak immune system.

-There is a more expensive version of the vaccination used in the United States that has zero chance of causing polio. It is in the dollars rather than cents.

-The vaccine is a liquid that is placed of a child’s tongue. The vaccine will go into the body and attack bad bacteria. Taking it about three times will make it 100% effective.

-Nigeria is one of the few places in the world where polio exists.

-If individuals received vaccines regularly, these diseases would not spread as fast. There needs to more effort for this to not happen again.

 

White Paper-Philly321

Hypothesis: Police officers do not receive individual attention regarding their mental stability following a life threatening scenario that calls for instantaneous reactions.

Hypothesis 2: Police officer’s choose not receive individual attention regarding their mental stability following a life threatening scenario because they fear for lack of confidentiality or perception of weakness.

It seems counterintuitive that we allow ordinary individuals to enter harmful, chaotic environments that ultimately affect both their physical and mental health in an effort to protect other people.  And to then assume, that after they endure life altering events, that they will either return to their former lives or even maintain a normal, healthy lifestyle without any effect upon themselves or their family members. (Expansion of my premise)

Short Arguments:

  1. Why Departments Need to Develop Mental Health Programs for Cops

The Essential Content of the Article: This article examines the idea that in a predominantly male culture that emphasizes toughness and a suck-it-up mentality, officers are forced to withhold their emotions and resort to detrimental methods of coping with their stress, including alcoholism, drug use, risk-taking behaviors, etc.

What it Proves: An officers health, confined by cultural beliefs,  is not being dealt with in a healthy, productive matter.

  • “In a predominantly male culture emphasizing toughness and a shrug-it-off, suck-it-up mentality, officers are forced to keep their feelings to themselves and resort to unhealthy methods of coping, which result in negative outcomes (such as alcohol abuse, risk-taking behaviors, etc.”
  • “Research has shown time and time again that police officer occupational stress is directly related to higher rates of heart disease, divorce, sick days taken, alcohol abuse, and major psychological illnesses such as Acute Stress Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, and Anxiety Disorders.”
  • Peers and supervisors should be trained to recognize an officer in distress, especially after an investigation is over.
  • The system of protecting our officers is broken, as it often fails to help officers by a lack of effort to do so.
  • Sure, there are a significant number of peer support programs in use by police departments throughout the USA and internationally, but not everywhere. Some departments still fail to recognize and help officers cope with their mental complications.
  • Just because an officer says that is “fine” doesn’t mean that it is going to stay that way. Perhaps he is lying to begin with.
  • Some officers oppress their true feelings because of the societal construct that men should not express their emotions.
  • The theory that all men should retrain their feelings is ludicrous because it is shown statistically that people who bottle up their problems can be a detriment to themselves or the people around them.
  • It is important to get treatment for officers, as certain problems could develop into more serious mental illnesses.
  1. PTSD Symptoms in Suburban Police Officers

The Essential Content of the Article: This article focuses on a study conducted by Cleveland State University that says 63% out of the 100 suburban cops surveyed stated that a critical debriefing period would be beneficial following an extremely stressful event related to duty. This study is dedicated to help officers, almost immediately, following an incident such as a mass shooting.

What it Proves: This survey is extremely useful because it supports my claim that officers are not given the proper care needed to maintain a level of stability in a highly stressful job. There is obviously a major flaw with law enforcement and I intend to expose this flaw by using these statistics.

  • “Many subjects said that they did not have much trust in their Employee Assistance Programs. The attitude seemed to be related to past experience and concern about not being understood by a superior when stress-related behaviors developed.”
  • States should require officers to talk with trained professionals at least once a week. This could be used as a debriefing period and a step away from work.
  • Employee Assistant Programs should consist of retired officers who have dealt with similar problems in their line of duty.
  • It doesn’t take much for an officer to go from a simple situation to a high stakes, life threatening situation.
  • The benefits of helping an officer cope with their line of duty the first few years far outweighs the cost of helping veterans or retired officers down the road.
  • Though many officers never encounter a life threatening situation, psychologists should still be required, as they could still suffer from high levels of stress.

Definition Essay: Life threatening scenario. Before I go into a Police officers health, I need to define life threatening scenarios. What makes a situation dangerous and/or more dangerous than another scenario? Perhaps pulling over a car and walking up to the window is equally as dangerous as approaching an active shootout with a criminal. I want to examine how these unrelated scenarios are similar.

Cause/Effect: I might need to demonstrate by research that when officers experience a highly stressful event, an officer may indulge is bad habits such as excessive alcohol or drug use, while their occupations demands their attention to the next case. This would demonstrate that we need to give individual attention to officers if we ever hope to avoid health disparities among police officers.

Cause/ Effect source: http://www.milestonegroupnj.com/?page_id=348

Rebuttal Arguments:

  1. Only police officers working in poorer neighborhoods or those with higher crime rates experience physical danger on an almost daily basis, which trumps the necessity of health care services for all officers nationwide.
  2. Statistics show that during a career, 95 percent of officers will never have to use deadly physical force.
  3. New advancements in medication, such as Xanax or Valium (taken only as prescribed), help officers cope with many distressing situations, which eliminates the need for public health services or psychiatrists.

Opening Strong:

Alternate first sentence: (Find story)… Officer (find name) is proud to pin the badge of the (find city) Police Department to her dress blues, but since she discharged her service revolver last April, the badge reminds her that she mortally wounded a teenager in the line of duty.

A police officer’s badge symbolizes an oath to serve and protect the people of this country, but for distressed police officer’s, a badge reminds them of an internal struggle caused by a deeply unnerving event in their line of duty. A nationwide study conducted from 2008-2012 by Pamela Kulbarsh, a psychiatric nurse for over 25 years and a member of San Diego’s Psychiatric Emergency Response Team, found that nearly 150,000 officers have experienced symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, not to mention the officers who, because of the stigma of appearing weak, have yet to come forward with their symptoms. But when officers decide to confront their physiological problems, Kulbarsh found that the men in blue were being deprived of a stable support system to help guide them in the right direction. For years, we have ignored the calls for help from the guardians of our safety who have pledged to protect our nation.

Current State of the Research Paper: I am feeling pretty good about the evidence I have gathered thus far. I think my opinion has solidified by the more research I have done. I anticipate that my eventual outcome will be that officers are naturally prone to stress by the confines of their job, but working with them could help manage their anxieties. I am basing on my paper on the premise that everybody dies, but not everybody lives. Officers should be provided access to more helpful services to help them cope with work, while also letting them live a normal, heathy life. We need to draw the line between work and living life.

The only problem I am really experiencing is the idea that we learned in class about the black and white shoe. I want my conclusion to be something out the ordinary. I do not want to be confined to black and white. I am having trouble thinking outside the box. I hope, with the more research I acquire, that i will be able to draw a more colorful conclusion.

Open Strong – nyctime7

The unforgivable acts of police brutality, should sometimes be forgiven. Outrage sparked from cop killings is misdirected, and in turn makes matters worse. It’s easy to point fingers and call police racist, but is it their fault? Under various circumstances, any human being is capable of committing acts of violence. Mainstream media’s constant portrayal of “good” and “bad” people, conditions people into developing a bias towards certain groups of people. Whether or not said bias is realized, it can very well influence a persons actions in every day life. Since police officers are still normal humans, it’s reasonable to assume that their inherent bias can one day come to fruition. Movements like “Black Lives Matter” only shed light on a piece of a larger problem, that law enforcement needs to be rebuilt.

Proposal+5 – nyctime7

For my research essay, I will be examining racism among police, and how movements like Black Lives Matter do more harm in solving the problem than good. Over the last few years, the topic of racism in the police force has become increasingly crucial. Some believe there is no such thing as racism anymore, while others think history is repeating itself. Mainstream media has covered numerous police killings, notably those of black men by white cops. This “new norm” spawned groups like Black Lives Matter, who try to bring light to the subject matter, in hopes of changing how blacks are treated. I believe racism is in fact alive in America, but I don’t necessarily believe that blacks are targeted more than other races. I’d like to examine whether or not the amount of violence towards blacks is a matter of race, or rather a problem with police as a whole. Are they treating everyone unfairly and require reform, or is there a specific disconnect between police and the black community.

 

  1. http://www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#

The Essential Content of the Article: The media doesn’t give all of the necessary information. Apparently Hispanics and whites suffer more casualties from cops than blacks.

What it proves: Blacks are not necessarily targets, but there is a problem with police and fatalities.

  1. http://blueprint.ucla.edu/feature/police-racism-search-for-answers/

 

The Essential Content of the Article: Racism by police isn’t necessarily on purpose.  The bias exists but individuals might not even know it.

What it proves: Racism may be too deep-rooted to treat each cop individually. Officers may think they’re doing the right thing, but are tasked to do something wrong.

  1. https://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/a-former-officer-explains-why-racist-police-violence-occurs-even-when-cops-arent-racist/

The Essential Content of the Article: Society and media have painted the picture of blacks being more dangerous than whites. It has somewhat become a part of our culture, making certain people inherently treat minorities differently. Some of those people become cops, and unfortunately tragedies are the result of said bad conditioning.

What it proves: Some police are simply products of their environment. A current mindset of your average American is slightly bias, so it is unrealistic to expect an officer to not be affected.

  1. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-w-whitehead/just-shoot-the-mindset-re_b_5432716.html%3E

The Essential Content of the Article: Law enforcement has slowly adopted the attributes of the military. The lines between police and military are beginning to blur, which can very well be the cause of the increase of police shootings. Perhaps some of that power needs to be taken away or toned down.

What it proves: The problem for law enforcement is bigger than race. Racial killings are the result of a bigger problem, which is the amount of power police are given

5.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/police-shootings-studies-racial-bias_us_5796f2d8e4b02d5d5ed2b4aa

The Essential Content of the Article: It’s hard to tell if shootings are racially motivated or not. However there are studies that show that police violence against minorities when compared to whites, does occur more often.

 

 

E06: Safer Saws- brobeanfarms

  1. Manufacturers
  2. Customers
  3. Consumer Safety Advocates
  4. Injured Plaintiffs
  5. Personal Injury Lawyers
  6. News Reporters
  7. Power Tool Product Reviewers
  8. Amputees

1a. “Our saws, besides being the highest quality and best featured saws in their market segments, feature the ability to detect contact with skin and stop the blade in less than 5 milliseconds.”
1b. The manufacturer is claiming that their saw is without an unreasonable doubt the best saw on the market, and now with the feature to detect contact on the skin, it has revolutionized this field.
1c. The claim is opinionated along with factual. The option is that their saws are the best on the market and the fact is the technology to detect contact on the skin.
1d. Due to the opinion, the manufacturer is obviously going to promote their saw. The technology however is factual and very beneficial. The manufacturer wants everyone who owns power saws to own this new technology as well.

2a. “To hold Bosch liable for not making a bad business decision that would cost them lots of money seems a bit unreasonable if not ludicrous.”
2b. Customers believe that manufacturers would lose a great amount of money for buying this technology. The amount of money spent would not be worth it when it comes to sales.
2c. This type of claim is 100% opinionated and could be debated as factual as well. The opinion is the loss of money but that could also be factual because the technology is expensive and the manufacturer already profits greatly on sales.
2d. This claim is accurate based on the opinion and fact because The technology is very costly.

3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.

4a. “Approximately 40,000 Americans go to hospital emergency rooms every year with injuries sustained while operating table saws. About 4,000 of those injuries – or more than 10 every day – are amputations.”
4b. The quote from the injured plaintiff is true and factual. It goes in depth on how many individuals are injured due to table saws and implies that changes must be made.
4c. This is a factual claim because it gives statistics on the injuries caused by table saws annually.
4d. These claims are accurate, due to the statistics. It gives a visual on the problem with table saws and the injuries that it causes. Based on these statistics, injuries would most likely greatly decrease with the implication of the new technology.

5a.

5b.
5c.
5d.

 

E03: Critical Reading- brobeanfarms

“You can hear the cat padding around. The air conditioner whooshes, a clock ticks.”

Vivid descriptions is what helps visualize a scene and bring everything to life for the reader. Visualization is key. Painting a visualized picture from words makes the setting and greatly helps the reader.

“Her nose starts running she’s so pissed, and there she is standing in a CVS, snotty and deaf with rage, like some kind of maniac, because a tiny elderly woman needs an extra minute to pay for her dish soap or whatever.”

The attitude of the writer helps describe the feeling and attitude of the tiny elderly women. Emotion helps set the attitude of the setting, and gives the reader emotion as well.

“As with most psychiatric diagnoses, there are no measurable objective biological characteristics to identify it. Doctors have to go on hunches and symptomology rather than definitive evidence.”

The reason’s for PTSD is pretty clear. Doctor’s can understand how it may have came about from past experiences that may be traumatizing, but the problem is what exactly affects the brain? Is this a real disease? Or is it all mentally on the replaying of the past traumatizing experiences over and over again? Doctor’s therefore are left to blindly diagnose based on symptoms rather than definitive evidence.

“Some hypotheses for why PTSD only tortures some trauma victims blame it on unhappily coded proteins, or a misbehaving amygdala. Family history, or maybe previous trauma.”

Why PTSD tortures some trauma victims is hard to pin point. Doctor’s obviously know why but they don’t know why it affects some and not others. The way the brain works is mysterious which leads to theories that is could be coded proteins or amygdala because the is not evidence backing PTSD up.

 

 

Princess, move this, please

  1. True / reasonable / Bad
  2. True / reasonable / good
  3. False / unreasonable / bad
  4. False / unreasonable / bad
  5. false / unreasonable / bad
  6. false / unreasonable / bad
  7. false / unreasonable / bad
  8. true / reasonable / good
  9. false / reasonable / bad
  10. false / reasonable / good
  11. false / reasonable / good
  12. True / reasonable / good
  13. False / unreasonable / bad
  14. false / unreasonable / bad
  15. true / reasonable / good
  16. false / reasonable / good
  17. false / unreasonable/ bad
  18. false / reasonable / good
  19. true / reasonable / bad
  20. true/ reasonable / bad
  21. false / reasonable / bad
  22. true / reasonable / good
  23. true / reasonable / bad
  24. true / reasonable / good
  25. true / reasonable / good
  26. true / unreasonable / bad
  27. true / unreasonable / bad
  28. false / reasonable / bad
  29. true / unreasonable / bad
  30. true / unreasonable / good
  31. true / reasonable / good
  32. true / reasonable / good
  33. true / unreasonable / bad
  34. true / reasonable / good
  35. false / reasonable / good
  36. true / reasonable / bad
  37. true / reasonable / bad
  38. false / reasonable / god
  39. true / reasonable / bad
  40. false / unreasonable / bad
  41. false / unreasonable / good
  42.  true / reasonable / bad
  43.  false / reasonable / good
  44. false / reasonable / bad
  45. true / reasonable / bad
  46.  true / unreasonable / bad
  47.  false / reasonable / good
  48.  true / reasonable / bad
  49.  true / unreasonable / bad
  50. false / reasonable / bad

Blind Summary

This article shows signs of being about revealing the issues with doctors successfully diagnosising breast cancer. There are many different ways to make the success of diagnosing breast cancer rate higher, but they are not being utilized by clinics and doctors across the nation. Doctors who misread these mammograms are not being held accountable for misdiagnosing these procedures, which in turn does not make these doctors to improve.

Polio Notes – nyctime7

  • Children are especially susceptible to polio.
  • Areas with bad hygiene are more likely to spread the disease.
  • Getting rid of polio isn’t an urgent matter for many people. Most people haven’t seen a person effected by polio, nor been affected themselves. For that reason, people would rather work on treating other widespread and prevalent diseases.
  • The combination of complacency and distrust complicate the use of vaccines.
  • Vaccinating everyone doesn’t actually save everyone. Children will die.

It’s unrealistic to think that the polio virus will be eradicated in the next 20 years, if ever. A concerted effort is required among all nations of the world, as well as unanimous trust. It’s reasonable to believe that someone somewhere will have doubts or their own agenda, which would complicate the effort. The day every nation worldwide cares enough about each other, polio can quite easily be eradicated. As long as every nation has different and separate priorities, polio will continue to exist.