Stone Money
What is money actually worth? Seems like a ridiculously stupid question, but the concept of money is a tricky one when you actually attempt to wrap your head around it, because in our everyday lives (at least here in America,) we just view tangible money as exactly that…money. If you had asked me what a dollar is worth when the class first met, the answer you would have received is “A dollar.” Just like $10, $25, $120,384, and so on, the answer would be whatever the “number value” is. Not a value other than the quantifiable units we make them out to be. In the This Is American Life podcast, The Invention of Money, the concept is thrown out that money is FICTION, by pointing out the housing crisis of 2008 when the stock market crashed, and billions were “lost” from the banks. But, where’d did the dollars actually go? That threw me off at first, but reading the other articles, I honestly thought about it. I thought about the pay I get direct deposited in my bank account. It isn’t like physical dollar bills are actually IN my bank account….only numbers. But, what about the $10, $25, or $120,384 bank statement that’s in your checking or savings account? It’s “supposedly” worth whatever the bank statement says, but do we know that that’s what it’s actually worth? Whenever you make a transaction or a deposit with a credit/debit card, no physical, tangible dollars get moved around…only numbers do, so how is that the same thing as having physical money in your wallet? Where is the money in your bank account even going, or coming from? The same goes for a physical check. The paper and ink that the physical check is only costs a minuscule amount of money, but we determine the WORTH by whatever amount is written on it. There’s nothing PHYSICALLY different about a blank check and a check with the order a certain number of dollars to be transferred…other than the number of dollars that are ordered to be transferred, so what makes that check worth more physical money than the blank one if they’re pretty much physically the exact same thing?
The Southern Pacific Island of Yap had an unorthodox method of exchanging currency in the first few decades of the 20th Century. According to Milton Friedman’s essay “The Island of Stone money,” the Yap realized that they needed a form of currency to be used there, which is essential in most (if not all) societies in the world. Their currency was different, because they imported and used limestone discs as money. Not limestone discs that you could fit in your pocket or easily move, but large discs, some of which couldn’t be easily moved due to the lack of machinery and automobiles on their small island. They used these to make large purchases, like buying a house from someone for example. They couldn’t physically take possession of the huge limestone disc from the buyer because of its size and weight, but wherever the disc lay, they had total possession of that particular disc. Then if the new owner of that disc decides to “sell” it for something else, they then would give the rights to the limestone disc to the person they’re purchasing their item from. And the cycle would keep going and going, and the same stone was being traded as currency without ever physically “changing hands.” And they were used, not necessarily for being imported from a far off island, but almost off of the strength of the fact that they owned the huge discs despite them never leaving its original physical spot. You or I would consider the limestone to be a nonsensical form of currency and WORTHLESS since it can’t be moved. But, that sounds very similar to how bank accounts work when you make a transaction. So if we’d deem their currency “worthless,” when aspects of the way we exchange money are strikingly similar…would that then deem our currency worthless also?
Another striking situation that gives the hint that money is a fictional concept of itself is Brazil’s economic crisis in the 1990s. They had a major problem where their unit of currency, the cruzeiro, which was consistently losing value and led to massive inflation of 80% a month. According to the NPR’s Planet Money article, How Fake Money Saved Brazil, stores had to change their prices literally every day. Their example: “The guy in the grocery store would walk the aisles putting new price stickers on the food. Shoppers would run ahead of him, so they could buy their food at the previous day’s price.” There would be no way to keep up with the daily rise of prices on everyday necessities, so the new prime minister of Brazil enlisted the help of four students studying in Rio. Tasked with saving the country’s economy, they developed a currency that wasn’t even real. They created the URV (Units of Real Value) to be a stable form of currency that didn’t inflate. Brazil would continue to use the cruzeiro, but everything would be listed in URVs, which gave the illusion of stable prices, thus restoring faith in Brazil’s economy, establishing a physical URV currency called the real, and bringing its citizens out of poverty.
So with those two examples, and the other articles that were posted, it seems to me that all types of currency holds no true, solid value…just the value of being BACKED by other people’s belief that the currency holds some type of worth as a means of trading in exchange of goods and services. It’s almost like saying, “Here’s $5. It’s worth $5 because the government says that it’s worth $5, and the people believe in the worth of the dollar” and not because there is an actual quantifiable value in that $5…but simply because they said that it was worth 5 dollar units. Just like the bank account example used earlier, it’s a backing by whatever particular bank that your money is “in.” That’s why you can buy things with a credit/debit card, not because your account is tangible, but the money in the account is backed by the bank, and whoever you received your purchase from has the faith in your bank that they will be paid the money that’s routed from your account when your purchase is made. There’s nothing PHYSICALLY in your account, and it only contains a number, and companies are willing to accept what isn’t even there because of the faith in the number of invisible dollars belonging to it. In my opinion after this assignment, money is a subjective item/concept that only exists so people can’t physically (or virtually) receive something for nothing. So the real question is, is the worth of the dollar ITSELF actually powerful…or is it the ECONOMY’S FAITH in the dollar’s, or whatever currency’s value, what makes it powerful even when it isn’t physically there?
Works Cited
Planet Money, By. “The Invention of Money.” This American Life. N.p., 7 Jan. 11.
“How Fake Money Saved Brazil.” NPR. NPR, 4 Oct. 2010. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.
Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” N.p., Feb. 1991. Web.
“The Island Of Stone Money.” NPR. NPR, 10 Dec. 2010. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.