White Paper — dragon570

Hypothesis: If football helmets are eliminated from the NFL and they use a different more effective tackling technique, for example, the way rugby players tackle. It will actually lessen the concussions rate.

The steps and benefits to the NFL getting rid of helmets:

  • Counterintuitive to say that NFL should get rid of football helmets.
  • Differences in the way football players tackle
  • Avoid/Eliminate blind side tackling in the NFL
  • Players are more cautious of the hits
  • Stricter penalties in the NFL
  • Concussions will decrease from this new method
  • Maybe less players on the football field.

1.) Working Hypothesis:

In football, helmets are colliding at least once every game because the way the football players were taught to  grab to try and bring another player down causes them to hit a part of their helmets to their opponents pads. Changing the way players are tackled can reduce the amount of concussions in the NFL.

2.) Topics For Smaller Paper:

Defintion/Classification Argument:

  • Rugby is a sport that doesn’t use pads or helmets. It’s also a world sport like soccer but not as popular. For example, Most countries have a rugby team that play against other countries.
  • A concussion is another word for brain injury that could affect a players life and maybe even their families lives.

Cause/Effect:

When football players don’t wear helmets and tackle differently it will then help them with not receiving a concussions because they are more cautious about their heads and it will prevent them and the person tackling the from receiving a career ending concussion.

Rebuttal Argument:

People would argue that if football helmets aren’t actually working the industries that make helmets should find a solution to it by adding more padding.

3.) Current State of the Research Paper:

I believe right now the sources I have so far are helping me find facts about my topic. I’m just trying to figure out how to put it all on “paper.” This is also giving me some more incite on the dangers of having football helmets.

Work Cited:

A7FL. “Safety – A7FL.A7FL. A7FL, n.d. Web. 06 Nov. 2016

 

Brain Concussion – Shake It and You Break It | Steven Laureys | TEDxLiège. Dir. Dr. Steven     Laureys. Perf. Steven Laureys. YouTube. YouTube, 2 May 2016. Web. 06 Nov. 2016.

 

Concussion: Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention.” WebMD. ebMD, n.d. Web. 07 Nov. 2016.

 

Dawson, Peter. “Rugby Tries – How and Where You Score Tries in Rugby.” RugbyHow. RugbyHow, n.d. Web. 07 Nov. 2016.

 

Drysdale, Thomas A. “Journal of Legal Medicine.” Helmet-to-Helmet Contact: Avoiding a Lifetime Penalty. Taylor And Francis Online, 13 Dec. 2013. Web. 06 Nov. 2016.

 

Fawcett, Robert. “Pads and Helmets: Rugby vs. Gridiron.” Pads and Helmets: Rugby vs. Gridiron. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2016.

 

Goff, Alex. “Concussions: Rugby Can Help Football.” The Post Game. RugbyMAG, 15 Oct. 2013. Web. 4 Dec. 2015.

 

Haislop, Tadd. “Football Helmets Are Creating More Problems than They Solve.” Sporting News. Sporting News, 28 May 2015. Web. 20 Nov. 2016.

 

Lemco, Tyler. Lemco: Why Football Needs Less Pads. Computer software. CBS Local Sports. CBS, 3 July 2015. Web. 04 Dec. 2016.

 

Quirk, Ryan, Jason McDonald, Meehawl Mofiodh, PJ Coward, Cameron Rudderham, Simon McCormack, and Gary Snook. “Re: Why Does Football Have a Much Bigger Concussion Problem than Rugby Even Though Rugby Players Wear Far Less Protection?” Blog comment. Quora. Quora, 13 July 2015. Web. 4 Dec. 2016.

 

Vrentas, Jenny. “Helmetless Football? It’s the New Practice at New Hampshire.” The MMQB. Muscles and Medicine, 4 Dec. 2014. Web. 04 Dec. 2016.

 

 

White Paper – BTB100

 

Hypothesis: By being involved in foreign affair we are opening up ourselves to having our national security attacked. Which leaves us wondering is it better to leave us out of other countries problems and have them face the problem to protect ourselves and our people.

In Syria there are many problems going on such as terroristic attacks as well as the people wanting a new face of the government. The US has had a long history with helping out with foreign countries and ending up going to war after so why risk our people when we can stay out of it and keep our citizens safe

Some problems that can occur by getting involved

  • Going to war
  • Having these terrorist go after us
  • Bring in harmful people to the country
  • Causes more problems in our country
  • We have many problems with getting involved with foreign affairs
  • We would be responsible for housing these people
  • Not sure who is coming in what harm they bring
  • Already have other problems too worry about rather than the safety of other countries

The only reason US would really get involved is to show off that they are still a powerhouse in terms of military strength and to just improve their economics, because getting involved in war has been known to bolster one’s economy.

Hypothesis 1:

We already have problems with being attacked by terrorists in the past recent years that have devastated many american lives and still to this day are trying to figure out a way to prevent these actions, why would we get involved with others problems that may lead to another attack from terrorists due to the threats that they feel are coming.

I believe that we should mind our own business and should figure out how to fix our own problems since there are many other big issues to deal with before we go cause more problems, if we really feel the need to have a helping hand maybe we ask a country who has all there stuff together to help them out in return for a reward or a deal.

Cause/effect

  • Get involved, chance the possibility of being attacked
  • Don’t get involved, we can fix other issues and cause less stress and worry for the people of America
  • Don’t allow these people to come in, protect our people from some of the nasty people who would bring in the sick ways to hurt our people

Definition/Class

A flaw could be if a country really needs our help and we don’t get involved how could it affect the rest of the world and would it show that the US isn’t a powerhouse like they used to be.      

  1. I feel I have made good progress just need to have a little more ideas to help prove my point and clarify my argument. I have many quotes on government ideas of being involved with foreign affairs as well as the people. So i believe I have some good info just need to bring it all together.

 

 

http://www.gallup.com/poll/187655/americans-name-terrorism-no-problem.aspx

White Paper- Phillyfan321

Hypothesis: The 7% New Jersey sales tax should not be lowered because it is not a regressive tax that affects the poor more than it does the upper class.

On January 1, 2017 the New Jersey Sales tax will go down to 6.875% from the current 7%. I do not believe this tax will benefit lower income families. The sales tax in New Jersey only applies to luxury items, not essentials that people need to survive.

Some items that are exempt from the New Jersey sales tax:

  • All canned food (vegetables,soups meat), except pet food.
  • Bottled water without flavoring
  • Cereal
  • Bandades
  • Juices with more than 50% juice
  • Raw vegetables
  • Vitamins
  • Deli Meat
  • Bread
  • Milk
  • Prescription Drugs
  • Aspirin
  • Clothing

The current sales tax law only applies to luxury items. Some examples of taxable items in New Jersey Include:

  • Alcoholic beverages
  • Tobacco (cigarettes, tobacco rolling papers, Cigars)
  • Prepared food (restaurant meals, fast food)
  • Pet food
  • Nail Polish

Some States do have a regressive sales tax because they do tax grocery items (North Carolina, Alabama, Kansas). The difference from these States sales tax is that they tax basic needs, the poorer citizens of these States have to pay the sales tax on basic goods while in New Jersey, they do not pay the sales tax on basic goods.

Most food that can be bought with SNAP benefits are sales tax exempt. Some examples of items that can be bought with SNAP benefits that are tax free are:

  • Bread
  • Fruits and vegetables
  • Milk
  • Meat
  • Canned items

Someone who relies on these SNAP benefits for food will not have to pay anymore for their basic groceries. While there are some items that can be bought with an EBT card, like soda which subject to the New Jersey sales tax,  but soda is not an essential item.

Working Hypothesis 1

I do not believe that the New Jersey Sales Tax should be lowered because it is a fair tax and does not unfairly affect the poor.

Working Hypothesis 2

The sales tax is a regressive tax on the lower tax and it affects them more than it does the upper class.

2.

Cause/Effect

  • If the sales tax is lowered then New Jersey will collect less sales tax revenue.
  • If the sales tax is lowered then prepared meals will cost a little less after taxes than they currently do  now.

Definition/Class

  • I may need to clarify more what an EBT and SNAP benefits are.
  1. I feel that my thesis and arguments for my claim are good. I have examples and facts to prove my claims. Writing an essay about this claim should be easy for me. I have good sources to back up my claim also.

White Paper-Philly321

Hypothesis: Police officers do not receive individual attention regarding their mental stability following a life threatening scenario that calls for instantaneous reactions.

Hypothesis 2: Police officer’s choose not receive individual attention regarding their mental stability following a life threatening scenario because they fear for lack of confidentiality or perception of weakness.

It seems counterintuitive that we allow ordinary individuals to enter harmful, chaotic environments that ultimately affect both their physical and mental health in an effort to protect other people.  And to then assume, that after they endure life altering events, that they will either return to their former lives or even maintain a normal, healthy lifestyle without any effect upon themselves or their family members. (Expansion of my premise)

Short Arguments:

  1. Why Departments Need to Develop Mental Health Programs for Cops

The Essential Content of the Article: This article examines the idea that in a predominantly male culture that emphasizes toughness and a suck-it-up mentality, officers are forced to withhold their emotions and resort to detrimental methods of coping with their stress, including alcoholism, drug use, risk-taking behaviors, etc.

What it Proves: An officers health, confined by cultural beliefs,  is not being dealt with in a healthy, productive matter.

  • “In a predominantly male culture emphasizing toughness and a shrug-it-off, suck-it-up mentality, officers are forced to keep their feelings to themselves and resort to unhealthy methods of coping, which result in negative outcomes (such as alcohol abuse, risk-taking behaviors, etc.”
  • “Research has shown time and time again that police officer occupational stress is directly related to higher rates of heart disease, divorce, sick days taken, alcohol abuse, and major psychological illnesses such as Acute Stress Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, and Anxiety Disorders.”
  • Peers and supervisors should be trained to recognize an officer in distress, especially after an investigation is over.
  • The system of protecting our officers is broken, as it often fails to help officers by a lack of effort to do so.
  • Sure, there are a significant number of peer support programs in use by police departments throughout the USA and internationally, but not everywhere. Some departments still fail to recognize and help officers cope with their mental complications.
  • Just because an officer says that is “fine” doesn’t mean that it is going to stay that way. Perhaps he is lying to begin with.
  • Some officers oppress their true feelings because of the societal construct that men should not express their emotions.
  • The theory that all men should retrain their feelings is ludicrous because it is shown statistically that people who bottle up their problems can be a detriment to themselves or the people around them.
  • It is important to get treatment for officers, as certain problems could develop into more serious mental illnesses.
  1. PTSD Symptoms in Suburban Police Officers

The Essential Content of the Article: This article focuses on a study conducted by Cleveland State University that says 63% out of the 100 suburban cops surveyed stated that a critical debriefing period would be beneficial following an extremely stressful event related to duty. This study is dedicated to help officers, almost immediately, following an incident such as a mass shooting.

What it Proves: This survey is extremely useful because it supports my claim that officers are not given the proper care needed to maintain a level of stability in a highly stressful job. There is obviously a major flaw with law enforcement and I intend to expose this flaw by using these statistics.

  • “Many subjects said that they did not have much trust in their Employee Assistance Programs. The attitude seemed to be related to past experience and concern about not being understood by a superior when stress-related behaviors developed.”
  • States should require officers to talk with trained professionals at least once a week. This could be used as a debriefing period and a step away from work.
  • Employee Assistant Programs should consist of retired officers who have dealt with similar problems in their line of duty.
  • It doesn’t take much for an officer to go from a simple situation to a high stakes, life threatening situation.
  • The benefits of helping an officer cope with their line of duty the first few years far outweighs the cost of helping veterans or retired officers down the road.
  • Though many officers never encounter a life threatening situation, psychologists should still be required, as they could still suffer from high levels of stress.

Definition Essay: Life threatening scenario. Before I go into a Police officers health, I need to define life threatening scenarios. What makes a situation dangerous and/or more dangerous than another scenario? Perhaps pulling over a car and walking up to the window is equally as dangerous as approaching an active shootout with a criminal. I want to examine how these unrelated scenarios are similar.

Cause/Effect: I might need to demonstrate by research that when officers experience a highly stressful event, an officer may indulge is bad habits such as excessive alcohol or drug use, while their occupations demands their attention to the next case. This would demonstrate that we need to give individual attention to officers if we ever hope to avoid health disparities among police officers.

Cause/ Effect source: http://www.milestonegroupnj.com/?page_id=348

Rebuttal Arguments:

  1. Only police officers working in poorer neighborhoods or those with higher crime rates experience physical danger on an almost daily basis, which trumps the necessity of health care services for all officers nationwide.
  2. Statistics show that during a career, 95 percent of officers will never have to use deadly physical force.
  3. New advancements in medication, such as Xanax or Valium (taken only as prescribed), help officers cope with many distressing situations, which eliminates the need for public health services or psychiatrists.

Opening Strong:

Alternate first sentence: (Find story)… Officer (find name) is proud to pin the badge of the (find city) Police Department to her dress blues, but since she discharged her service revolver last April, the badge reminds her that she mortally wounded a teenager in the line of duty.

A police officer’s badge symbolizes an oath to serve and protect the people of this country, but for distressed police officer’s, a badge reminds them of an internal struggle caused by a deeply unnerving event in their line of duty. A nationwide study conducted from 2008-2012 by Pamela Kulbarsh, a psychiatric nurse for over 25 years and a member of San Diego’s Psychiatric Emergency Response Team, found that nearly 150,000 officers have experienced symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, not to mention the officers who, because of the stigma of appearing weak, have yet to come forward with their symptoms. But when officers decide to confront their physiological problems, Kulbarsh found that the men in blue were being deprived of a stable support system to help guide them in the right direction. For years, we have ignored the calls for help from the guardians of our safety who have pledged to protect our nation.

Current State of the Research Paper: I am feeling pretty good about the evidence I have gathered thus far. I think my opinion has solidified by the more research I have done. I anticipate that my eventual outcome will be that officers are naturally prone to stress by the confines of their job, but working with them could help manage their anxieties. I am basing on my paper on the premise that everybody dies, but not everybody lives. Officers should be provided access to more helpful services to help them cope with work, while also letting them live a normal, heathy life. We need to draw the line between work and living life.

The only problem I am really experiencing is the idea that we learned in class about the black and white shoe. I want my conclusion to be something out the ordinary. I do not want to be confined to black and white. I am having trouble thinking outside the box. I hope, with the more research I acquire, that i will be able to draw a more colorful conclusion.

Polio Notes-Prof2020

– paralysis

– prevalent in areas with bad hygiene

– very easily transmitted

– thrives where society is uprooted and tumultuous

– once eradicated, eradication is permanent

– distrust from those affected hinders mass treatment

– we become complacent with vaccinations for diseases we haven’t experienced

– 1 in every 3 million children vaccinated gets paralyzed, 350/year

– many doctors no longer recognize the symptoms

– many believe vaccines cause autism

– wakefield paper

 

Practice Opening

If getting vaccinated would help to eradicate polio from the earth and result in your permanent paralysis, would you do it? Polio is one of the most easily transmittable viruses in the world. Because of its mobility and that it can take up to ten days for symptoms to begin, the Poliomyelitis virus can be extremely dangerous. Thankfully, a vaccine has been developed with an enormous amount of success. However, a possible outcome of the polio vaccination is paralysis. That’s not all too surprising seeing as most vaccinating products include a weakened or inactive form of the virus it seeks to defend you from. In rare cases, about 1 in 3 million, the viral strain in the vaccination can actually give the recipient the Poliomyelitis virus.