The “truthful” studies that we believe because they are backed by scientific research may be completely wrong. Society as a whole views studies that are backed with scientific research as the complete truth for something as meticulous and methodical as research leaves an indication that something that went through thorough trials must be true. However, the data that is brought from many studies can be easily manipulated to show a correlation between two different variables that shouldn’t have anything to do with each other. It is completely viable for data for something that is pushed for something Democratic to easily be manipulated to push something Republican with the same data. The issue lies with how these studies that imprint a certain vendetta may only be truthful under certain circumstances and can be influenced by the people funding them. And with the lack of replication test that is highly underfunded and underappreciated to refute these false studies, the companies that fund a study may be able to press a flawed version of the truth.
Companies that fund
Rowan Counterintuitive 
Good strong counterintuitive opening sentence there, Hawkman.
You get wordy and repetitive after that, but you continue to press your case.
Good work overall.
Grade +1
LikeLike