Stone Money- DudeInTheBack

P1. To list all of the effects money has on our world would be impossible simply because money is what keeps the world working. It’s true, without some form of monetized systems for trading, who would want to work, and why would they do it? Because of moneys value, and the way we (as a society) view currency, we work almost purposefully for the money. The motivation for “gettin’ the money” can fully be credited to what we can do with the money. A piece of papper, coin, or rock (currency) acts like a sort of value placeholder. Through these past classes, and extending work outside the classroom learning about different histories of moneys worth has been fascinating to me just because of its knottiness.

P2. Money is the most basic, yet convoluted unit of measurement to determine the degree of what someone, or something is worth. I say measurement now, (and probably would not have even thought of money being a measurement a couple weeks ago) because it really is a measurement. money measures things like wealth, or any asset with substantial value. For example, if you have a big cow, somehow you acquired this big cow. Two likely scenarios predating this acquisition could potentially be: You were granted through time and breeding this big cow, and now you want to sell it. The other being you just bartered something else with what the previous cow owner thought was of equal value. Without this rudimentary measurement of worth, how would one be able to justify what one owns? This value, in todays society, is expressed through currency. having money backing everything gives everything a tradable value.

P3. These questions of why money has value, or how we assigned the job of having value to an object, can only be answered by examples of how monetary value has been used/how it is used today. Thorough my somewhat extensive research on all of the unfathomable ways money has been used. After all of it, I have come to the conclusion that money is not a real thing. What! how could this be? Relax. It’s a real tangible thing if you consider object currency, but money is a concept. A sort of placeholder for an imaginary unit. After reading about the Island of Yap, located in the Pacific ocean, my thoughts on how abstract money can get began to develop. Picture this, huge limestone carved disks with holes in the middle of them weighing in at about seven or eight metric tons. In the island, these stones, or “Fei” was used as a currency. Massive stone coins that sat where everyone could see them, and everyone just knew who they belonged to. In an essay by Friedman on the concept of stone money, he explains, “… it is not necessary for its owner to reduce it to possession.” The owners of the stone, and the wealth of having the stone did not even need to have possession of this stone. If it was “there” it was recognized as being there. A very abstract concept, but surprisingly effective and efficient for the island. A parallel to this currency of Fei, is our modern day checks, and even bank accounts in general. How much money in your bank account are you actually physically touching? None. Its just some digital number that gives you some sort of worth. Its the same thing as having the stone. People just recognize your wealth by having a big stone, or a big number in your bank account.

P4. My new view on money and how I have come to the realization that it is fake also comes from a story in Brazil. After listening to the NPR broadcast “How Fake Money Saved Brazil”  I have gained a deeper confusion on how the money system works. Chana Joffe-Walt, the narrator of the podcast in act one says that, “in 1990 inflation in Brazil was 80 percent a month…” Having such high inflation rates, the Government was at a loss for solutions. A group of colleagues were called in to find a solution, coming up with a virtual currency named, “Unit of Real Value” (URV’s). The government along with the four heroic alumni called in made the decision to lie to the citizens. One of the people on the podcast saying, “… they wanted to change people themselves… people had to be tricked into thinking money had value.” (Joffe-Walt). Persuading them that their money actually had value was the only way to save the economy, and the value of their currency. “The idea was that people would start thinking in URVs – and stop expecting prices to always go up.” (Joffe-Walt). Brazil lived with high inflation rates for decades, if this problem could be solved so easily by making up what seemed like a lie to get them out seems counterintuitive. Who would think that would work? Well, It did, and that’s what saved Brazils economy.

P5. Today, we have a new complicated currency called Bitcoin. In 2009, Bitcoin software was made available to the public for the first time. Although Bitcoin was the first established cryptocurrency, there were others… but they did not blow up like Bitcoin.  Bernard Marr, said in his article called, ”A Short History Of Bitcoin And Crypto Currency Everyone Should Read” said ”As it had never been traded, only mined, it was impossible to assign a monetary value to the units of the emerging cryptocurrency.” (Bernard Marr) Mining was a long process where your bitcoin could grow, but still, no real monetary value. Supply and demand began to grow for bitcoin. Where in 2010 bitcoin was practically worth nothing, to skyrocketing into being worth millions.

P6. I have learned a lot about money these past couple weeks, and I find all of this information very interesting. currency has gone through so many stages, and adaptations to new society’s. Not a lot of people are familiar with things liken the island of stone money, and I certainly was never taught it. History has presented us with many crazy currencies… which brings me to the question, “whats next”? What new currency, or value of something will go up/down? We will never know until we get there.

Work Cited

This entry was posted in A02: Stone Money, DudeInTheBack. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Stone Money- DudeInTheBack

  1. davidbdale says:

    I’m very impressed with my first read-through of this fine draft, DB. You’ve managed to BE academic but not SOUND academic. Much more to say later, but for now, Bravo.

    Like

  2. dudeintheback says:

    thank you professor, I would love to hear some critique

    Like

  3. davidbdale says:

    DB, I’ve numbered your paragraphs for easy reference. Let’s start with notes on P1.

    What is its purpose?
    You might tell me, “To get my reader’s attention,” and I wouldn’t disagree. Or you might say, “To introduce the subject,” and I wouldn’t disagree. However, I would suggest that the world is full of distractions, and readers are hard to come by, even harder to keep. So the most important job of your first sentence is to compel readers to read the second sentence (and the most important job of the second sentence? you guessed it.). If you were a potential reader faced with several competing distractions, would you make it to your second sentence?

    Let’s examine your paragraph in search of drama that would keep a reader reading. Sentence by sentence, you’ve made these points:
    —Money keeps the world working.
    —Money is a monetized system of trading.
    —Because it has value, we will work for money (a restatement of the first claim).
    —We work for “what money does.”
    —Currency objects are value placeholders.
    —Money’s meaning is complex.

    Is there a dramatic way to roll these claims into one main idea and tease it in the first sentence AND combine the concepts with a tangible illustration (a cow or chip) that makes a reader SEE or FEEL your point?

    To demonstrate the utterly abstract nature of how transactions get “paid for” in the modern world:

    If I told the painting crew that, in return for their labor, I was going to move some green paper from one drawer to another, I’d never get my house painted.

    To demonstrate that the “money” they’ll earn represents something different (and never cash) for the painters:

    If it weren’t for money, our houses would never get painted. We’d have to find a crew of painters who all wanted something we could provide; for one, a fine restaurant meal; for another, a used car; for the third, a dental visit.

    What I’m suggesting is that the sooner you can immerse your reader in the mystery, the more likely you are to engage her in the investigation you yourself undertook when you read and listened to your sources.

    Does that seem like useful advice?
    I thrive on replies. Please respond so we can proceed to other paragraphs and recommendations.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s