Rebuttal Argument – darnell18

Racial profiling still exists on the roads in today’s society. Nevertheless, there are many rebuttals that arise from this hot topic. To name a few, some may argue that many traffic stops including black drivers are just a coincidence that they are minorities and actually did something illegal to get pulled over. Others say that a large contributing factor into this issue is what race the officer is that is making the stop. For example, it could be considered to have less discriminatory intent if a black officer pulls over a black man. With all of this being said, both of these are legitimate points and do occur, but yet, they do not nearly account for the majority of stops with an African American in the car.

As far as the color of the police officer goes, it affects how society and the driver view the situation in a way that can seem less discriminatory, but still it is not that way one-hundred percent of the time. An African American officer can still discriminate against a man or woman of the same race. It may seem less suspicious seeing it, but it can not be overlooked. The color of a person’s skin does not always go hand in hand with their mindset and outlook on life. There is no saying that a black man and white man cannot share the same stereotypical mindset towards black people.

In addition to the rebuttal of same-race officers and drivers, people who disagree with the claim that racial profiling while driving is a real issue may counter the argument by saying any one of the stops that happen daily could be a coincidence. The thought is that these black drivers could be pulled over simply because they are breaking the law. While this may hold true for a fair amount of instances, it does not explain why nearly 2 percent more blacks (4.7%) are pulled over without a reason than whites (2.6%), according to Christopher Ingraham in his article titled “You Really Can Get Pulled Over For Driving While Black, Federal Statistics Show.” That statistic is unsettling because if somebody deserves to be pulled over for their driving, regardless of race, then so be it. But with that being said, minorities should not double the amount of whites in a category like this. They are called minorities for a reason, and that is because there are less of them in this country. Therefore, to lead substantially in that category leads to a much worse ratio than whites also getting pulled over without a reason.

Another example of the skewed ratios reported by Kim Soften in her article, “The Big Question About Why Police Pull Over So Many Black Drivers,” is that “a study of Connecticut traffic stops in 2014 and 2015 — among the states with the most recent data — found that 14 percent of traffic stops targeted black drivers, despite them making up only 9 percent of the state’s population.” Yet again, this supports the claim that these stops are not all simply coincidental. This is also a very recent study, so as we think we made tremendous progress with an African American president over the last 8 years, which we did to an extent, many people still continued to turn a blind eye to racism and discrimination in its various different forms.

In conclusion, there are logical and understandable rebuttals to this issue in society. Nevertheless, they can be refuted as well. People who pretend it is not real and deny certain statistics may be part of the problem. If more people in this country were open-minded and socially aware we would have a better opportunity to push for change, justice, and equality.

Works Cited

Ingraham, Christopher. “You Really Can Get Pulled Over For Driving While Black, Federal Statistics Show” The Washington Post. 09 Sept. 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2016

Soften, Kim. “The Big Question About Why Police Pull Over So Many Black Drivers” The Washington Post. 08 July 2016. Web. 30 Oct. 2016

2 thoughts on “Rebuttal Argument – darnell18”

    1. Darnell, I’m going to be merciless here since this is your Rebuttal (not your Rebuttal Rewrite yet), and I haven’t had much opportunity to show you just how critical a reading can be. You make some valid points here, but WAY too much of what you say is padding, filler, boilerplate, call it what you will.

      First of all, you don’t need to repeatedly tell readers you are writing a Rebuttal Argument. They couldn’t care less. Your job is simply to refute someone else’s argument once you’ve explained what it is. Identify the argument as economically as you can, then offer the brilliant evidence that refutes it. I’ve boiled your paragraphs down to the essential language they require to achieve your goals. Anything you add should be very pertinent. There’s no need to restate any of these claims, but you could expand on all of them, view them from fresh perspectives, illustrate them with a number, an anecdote, a relevant quote . . . .

      P1. Racial profiling is a fact of life for black drivers on America’s roads. It’s not a coincidence, and the race of the officer who pulls over a driver because of his race is irrelevant. Far too often, black drivers are accosted by highway patrol officers at least in part because of their race.

      P2. Black officers are just as capable as white officers of profiling black drivers. There is no evidence to suggest that black officers are less likely to stop, question, ticket, or arrest black drivers. They are just as likely as police officers to act prejudiced, whether or not they share the prejudices of white officers.

      P3. Coincidence cannot explain the disparity between white and black traffic stops. Let’s examine instead the premise that more black drivers than white drivers are visibly breaking the law on the highway. [insert evidence to refute this premise] Kim Soften says, in the Washington Post, that “a study of Connecticut traffic stops in 2014 and 2015 — among the states with the most recent data — found that 14 percent of traffic stops targeted black drivers, despite them making up only 9 percent of the state’s population.” If that disparity is based on observed violations, the statistics should support it.

      P4. According to federal statistics shared by Christopher Ingraham in the Washington Post, “nearly 2 percent more blacks (4.7%) are pulled over without a reason than whites (2.6%)” No argument based on observed law-breaking can explain why twice as many blacks as whites are pulled over when nothing is observed.

      P4. We think that, because we have an African-American president, we have eliminated racism over the last 8 years, but clearly discrimination continues.

      P5. Defenders of the police deny the statistics and pretend racial profiling is imaginary. But racist behavior can’t be eliminated until socially aware Americans push for change, justice, and equality.

      All told, when the filler is eliminated, you’ve got just over 300 words of meat on these bones, Darnell, which leaves you about 700 words to strengthen and embellish your arguments with data, illustration, and the other fruits of your research.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s