Safer Saws- Tiggs18

1a)  If Table Saws Can Be Safer, Why Aren’t They?

1b) Table saws are dangerous, they can be safer,  they should be, we need to make them safer if they are capable.

1c) This is a proposal claim.  The author is giving an opinion in which many others would agree with.

1d) The claims being made in the first sentence are very substantial.  Table saws are very dangerous and there is accidents that happen all the time in which can be stopped by a SawStop creation.  The quality behind this claim just makes real sense.  We know when watching the videos and also reading on the technology that injuries can be stopped, but companies do not wish to pay for this which makes no real sense.

1e) I do not disagree with this claim because it makes sense in all the right ways.  If table saws are dangerous, and can be improved to make them safer, they should be.

 

2a) “I’ve tried to be fair, but the more I hear about SawStop and Stephen Gass, the more of a bully and a jerk they seem to be.”

2b) Unanimous voice who said this quote seems to think that because Gass is seeing for the rights, that it makes him a jerk for some reason.  Clearly this isn’t the first time that it has came up.

2c) Opinionated claim.  This is what this person thinks but obviously does not mean he is a jerk to e everyone.

2d) I think that this can be a persuasive claim if anything because they can make other people think the same about Gass.  Other then it being persuasive, i do not think it is good quality because it is just a hate quote.

2e) I do refute this claim.  The idea of the flesh detecting mechanism is his own and no one should be able to create the same thing and just give it a different name.  Gas should have the right to sue and it does not make him a jerk just because he is pissed about some companies stealing his idea.

 

3a) “Safety doesn’t sell”

3b) Basically exactly what the quote says, explains the quote.  The product which produces safety just does not sell to bigger companies.

3c) This is a proposal claim because it makes a suggestion that the safety machine does not sell.  It is not factual because it is not true in all aspects.

3d) This claim is both accurate and reasonable because it is true in a sense of the bigger businesses not wanting to buy his idea which can save so many injuries that happen so often.  It doesn’t make much sense that they do not want to buy his safety product.  It is proven that table saws cut off around 4000 fingers per year and by his idea, this number can be lowered to so few.

3e) I agree with this claim.  It is true.  The companies don’t want to spend money on him but they will make their own and name it something else.  It doesn’t make sense.

 

4a) Table saws cause tens of thousands of serious injuries every year, costing billions of dollars.

4b) This claim means that because of the injuries that happen from table saws, there are lots of dollars spent in helping people recover and hospital bills.

4c) This is a factual claim.  There are not many that can be factual but this one provides evidence for it.  It is clear that table saws do make injuries more common and they happen a lot and obviously money has to be spent for bills at the doctors or hospitals.

4d) This claim is very accurate for its own reasons.  It is obvious what this claim means and there is no real way to argue against it because it obviously does cost money for bills for injuries and its proven and numbers have been taken on how many injuries happen per year from them.

4e) I agree with this claim.  There is no reason to disagree with the claim because it is obviously true and factual.

 

5a) “No offense, but I don’t think this is a move by Bosch (or any other tool manufacturer for that matter) to prevent safety devices, but simply a move to prevent the unintended consequences of adding mandatory safety devices that would, in some instances, double the price of entry level power saws.”

5b) This claim is trying to say that whomever is saying this statement, thinks that the big companies are not the ones who are saying no to the saw stop idea and paying Gass for it but because it will raise the chance of companies having to make mandatory decisions to put it on every saw which will raise the price of making them.

5c) This is someones opinion.  This is just someone saying what they think the hold on paying Gass is about.

5d) I think this person knows what they are talking about but in  a say we actually do not know exactly what the real reasons are.  The claim they make is ideal and still does sound like it could be a legit reason.

5e)  I agree with this claim in a way because it could be one of the reasons that this is actually happening.

 

6a) “Injured Man Says Bosch Tool Lobbied Feds to Keep Safer Power Saws off the Market”

6b) Claim states that a man who was injured by most likely a Bosch Tool, says that the company told federals to not let power saws get any safer.  This is a huge problem because if the company told these people to not change anything, then there is something behind the fact that they would most likely lose money.

6c) This is a Proposal claim because the man might not be telling the truth but there is no facts behind if its true.  And its not opinionated because that is not the right type of argument.

6d) Seems like this is more persuasive because this person is trying to get others to turn on the company.  It sounds like something that could happen but also not sure if companies would do something like this knowing that people are being injured all the time.

6e) Not really a chance to disagree with it because its not someones opinion and its something that someone said a company did.

 

7a) “Pretty amazing that I only had to put on a band-aid. The saw reacted so quickly that I didn’t even know what had happened. Saved my thumb from a serious injury and saved my company lots of money.”

7b)  Claim made of a comment from someone that could have got hurt but because of a saw incident but because of SawStop technology, he had nothing other then a cut on his finger.

7c) Proposal claim.  This person is making a suggestion that the SawStop saved him from losing a finger or having a bad injury.

7d) This is a very well said quote.  It is very obvious that the SawStop technology can save people from injury and this is a man that says to a point that it has actually happened to him and his hand is saved because of it.  I think the quality of this claim is good because it goes to show people how this saw really helps.

7e) I agree to what i can with this claim.  Its not something much that that one can agree with but by reading it, i can see that this product really is a big help.

 

8a) “Seems to be the best saw I have ever owned!”

8b) This is probably one of the strongest claims that you can find.  Its made of a straight opinion that says that this person is very strong of the saw.

8c) Opinionated claim.  This is someones claim or statement that they think this saw is obviously the greatest one they’ve ever used.

8d) Nothing much about this claim other then it being straight up with no reasons why this person believes this but them just saying this because of usage and that is most likely it.

8e) Not sure i agree with this claim because I’ve never used the saw but i can’t not agree with it because it does seem as if it could have some potential to be one of the best.