Summaries- Beyonce1234

The Choice of Shoes, a Mirror, or a Marshmallow

The Mirror of Dorian Gray:

It seems counterintuitive that a choice a person makes can define someone’s personally traits. Apparently, a certain way a person parts their hair defines some of the character traits. If it is on the left, one is most likely to be more vocal and logical. If the part is on the right side, the person is more artistic and visual. We only see our selves one way when we look in a mirror. We see exactly the opposite of what everyone else sees. One day, the author of the article, bought a special mirror. This mirror is called a True Mirror.

It is only true because the reflection is how people really see things. When someone looks into it, they can see how other people see the part in their hair or their bodies. It is mostly impossible to do anything but look into that mirror. What ever direction a person does, the mirror will show the opposite. It would be a miracle if someone completed their makeup or done their shaving right without a disaster. A man named Dorian Gray came up with this new mirror.

What Does the Marshmallow Test Actually Test?:

It seems counterintuitive that people would wait to eat a cookie, at least for me. No one could ever go wrong with cookies. But really, it’s pretty counterintuitive that a test like this can discover what kind of motivation people seem to have. That test goes like this… there was a man named Walter Mischel, and he made an experiment for his nursery-school students. The students had a couple choices in this experiment. They could choose to either, pick a treat out of a cookie, a pretzel, or a marshmallow, or if they waited 15 minutes, they can choose a forth treat. What Mischel found was that the students that actually waited those 15 minutes were over all better students. They were the more patient and motivated students than the ones who choose to pick one of the three snacks without any waiting.

A new study, and more in depth, experiment has been done by Celeste Kidd. What she did was that she took the same concept but with different age groups and with different points on interest with that age group. She used three-to-five year old for her experiment. The kids had two choices, which was to keep the dull, used crayons to draw or wait 15 minutes and use a new 24 pack. The experiment was basically split half and half, but half of them were told that there was no new pack of crayons.

Right after, Kidd tried to marshmallow experiment. More students this time decided not to wait because they figured there wasn’t going to be a new treat for them in the end. In the end, Mischel’s experiment seemed to focus more on the student’s self-control rather than determination. Kidd’s experiment focused on how the children live at home and how much logic they really have.

Do Toms Shoes Really Help People?:

It is counterintuitive that we shouldn’t trust what businesses and companies are telling us. It has been proven that the Tom’s shoe company has not been telling the full truth about giving shoes to the children of Africa. For the young Americans today, that sounds like something so saint-like, of course I want to buy a pair! I don’t want any African child with out shoes! What kind of person would I be if I didn’t buy these shoes?! A gullible person, that’s who.

In reality, the student’s of Africa already have shoes to go to school in because the schools give them shoes if they don’t. But don’t get me wrong, these children should get as many pairs as they can, like all of us have. The thing is, Tom’s is making it seem like if they don’t donate a pair of shoes, the children will be deprived of their education, which isn’t the truth. A company lying might not come as a surprise to most people because that’s how the world apparently works now-a-days, but Tom’s shoes shouldn’t get all the praise they are getting for their “charity work.”

Movie Image- Beyonce1234

Donate To Food Banks

0:00- There is a boy, assuming to be about nine or ten years old. This boy has short light brown hair with white skin. He is wearing a light blue shirt and looks like he is walking somewhere on a sidewalk. He is also wearing a grey backpack which can be assumed that he goes to school and is either walking home or to school. The setting looks like a sunny day in the suburbs. There is a street with no cars, though maybe there are vehicles down the street but who knows. The background is unclear because the camera is focused on the back side of this boy’s head. We can see that he is also walking on the right side of the street.

0:01- The camera angle is still focused on the back of the boy’s head, but now angled more on the right side of him. There is yet to see this boy’s face. In this shot, there is now a fence in the background with some bushes. It looks like he is entering a yard, opening the gate. The fence isn’t wood or brick, but only thin wire.

0:02-0:03- The boy now enters a house, assuming it is his parents’ or guardian’s. We now see his body from the knees down. He is wearing average jeans with average tennis shoes. The door in light blue and floors are tile.

0:04- The boy enters a kitchen while ripping off his backpack, assuming after a long day at school. The clock in the back read 3:35, so it can be assumed. The camera is placed in a room next to the kitchen but as if the audience is watching the child from inside that room. The kitchen is average as well. There is a table with chairs in the center, and a counter and sink in the back with a big window above. There is also a silver, two-door refrigerator. The floors are black and white tile. In the room we are watching from, there is a painting of hand prints on the wall. Maybe it is one of each children living in that house, therefor six, or the one child’s hand several times, in several colors. It is hard to tell, but the hands are all the same size. Beside the picture, there are some color pencils of some sort, assuming the boy likes to draw or color often. There is also some counters and cabinet space in this room as well.

0:05-0:06- The boy then opens one side of the refrigerator. We can now see that there is some art work that has been attached with magnets. We can assume that the boy might have made them from school. From the new angle of the camera, from a floor view, we can see that the table only has two chairs. This could indicate there are only two people living in that house, and the boy might have just one parent.

0:07- We can now see what is inside of the refrigerator and it’s not much at all. There are three containers of some sort of left over food. There is one container of a dip perhaps. One jar of salsa and a box filled with some substance that is unknown because of the angle of it. We can also see a part of the back of the boy’s head, and we can tell is looking at the same things we are.

0:08-0:09- Here the audience can see the boys face through the opening between the door of the refrigerator and the side of the refrigerator. His face looks disappointed at what he sees. His eyes are looking down and his face as a whole doesn’t look pleased.

0:10- 0:11- The camera changes again to a view of the whole refrigerator, and we can now see some condiments on the door. The boy looks over at them and back quickly. We can now see another shelf in the refrigerator that has three more little containers with some sort of left over food. Over all, the refrigerator doesn’t look very appetizing.

0:12- The boy then steps upon one of the wooden chairs that he placed in front of the counter and some of the cabinets. We can assume he has closed the refrigerator door and moved the chair to see what other kinds of food are in the cabinet. The camera is back to just about where it was when it was in the other room, next to the kitchen. We can see more of a child’s art work on the front of the refrigerator too.

0:13-0:14- Now, the boy opens up the cabinet door. We can see what’s inside because the camera is now behind the boy’s head, but it is focused on the cabinet itself. We can see some flour and spices within two shelfs in the cabinet. There might be some sugar and meat seasoning, but there’s not much, or at least not many items a child around nine or ten can put together for a snack.

0:15- The new camera angle points right into the face of disappointment. His hazel/green eyes still looking into that cabinet, waiting for his favorite snack to magically appear. His lips not looking like they are going to smile anytime soon.

0:16-0:17- We are back to the camera angle in the next room looking into the kitchen. The boys seems to have just gotten down from the chair and starts to head out of the room from where he came in the first place. We can still see the disappointment on his face as well. The audience can tell that he knows that there is nothing to eat, but it seems like he is used to it. He might be leaving because there is no more hope for anything good to happen in that room. It seems like the boy accepts the fact that there is no food, and he will have to wait until later to eat. The boy might be finding something else to do with his free time he has since eating is out of the picture.

0:18- This is a new angle of the boy walking out of the room. It is closer to his face, and the audience can now see only his upper body. Here, we see the boy taking one last, quick look at the refrigerator while leaving. He looks at it up to down, looking very disappointed and scared because of not knowing when he will eat. The boy then walks out of view.

0:19-0:24- The commercial then cuts to an older lady, around 30, facing the camera. She is standing in that same kitchen, speaking to the camera. She has short blonde hair and blue eyes. She is wearing a shirt with a pink pattern and a navy blue blazer. In the corner of the screen, there is the words “Feeding America” in orange and green writing. The lady then talks to the camera for about five seconds.

0:25-0:30- For the rest of the commercial, the logo of the organization is presented in large words. It says “Feeding America” with their website “FeedingAmerica.org” underneath. The audience can assume that the people of the commercial would like the audience to visit the website and find out more about this organization.

This commercial clearly indicates that there is an issue with hunger. Children come home hungry from a long day of school and have very little to eat or no food at all. This commercial is an advertisement for an organization that feeds the hungry. By the title of the video, we know that the boy could not find food because there is no food at the local food banks. Because of that, the woman at the end was most likely saying something along the lines as to why people should donate, most likely with a depressing fact about child hunger.

Stone Money – Beyonce1234

I am not an expert on the concept of money, what so ever. Thinking and understanding these stories and issues are not easy. Places like Yap, with their stone money and Brazil with their fake (now real) currency isn’t easy to understand the concept of. Being an American teenager, now a young American woman, there is very little thought about money on my mind. I know that one receives money and one spends the money. Only that seems relevant to me.

While studying where the concept of money came from, I realized there are more connections with different currency than not. We have thousands of dollars in a bank that gives us only a number on a screen of how much money we have. We do not physically see this money, we only just assume its there. We put money into our bank accounts and the bank then gives that same money for a loan to someone else. Though, the amount of money is still there in your same bank account and the amount does not change. The Invention of Money discusses how money is only fiction and doesn’t really exists. How can that same money a person owns them self go to someone else, yet each person has more than what they started with. How can that be if money was real? It can’t.

The people of Yap are doing no different than what we, Americans, are doing today. The citizens of Yap do not see the gargantuan limestone boulders, yet they knew it belonged to them or another citizen. “Is the one practice really more rational than the other?” Milton Friedman states in his Island of Stone Money essay. This got me thinking that, no, I don’t think that there is much of a difference. A person works all their life to make their number at the bank the highest they can possibly get. A person in Yap trade for their stone money and work for that. Neither of which can carry to a store or put in ones pocket.

Brazil on the other hand had a different issue, though still not too different from America. Back in the day, when we used gold as the value of our money, it eventually started not to work in our favor. There was not enough to spread around to all Americans. We then came up with another plan. Something new but not unheard of, paper money. We printed them and shared with the banks to spread to the people and a new way of money was made. Brazil achieved with their new currency, using URVs. This stood for Unit of Real Value. Which, for me, seemed pretty iconic since the money wasn’t real at all until much later.

Fortunately, this worked out for them and helped their inflation problem. As discussed in the broadcast, How Fake Money Saved Brazil, this only succeed because people’s faith in the value of the money. People had to have faith in the concept, the progress, and the money itself. Money is only valuable because of the amount of people’s faith that is put in it. This obviously took many years to master the URV money into real money, but only because the people’s faith and mind believe the fake money to be valuable.

Bitcon money, on the other hand, was also very similar to URV. This digital currency was not seen, and was only to exist online. My view point with this system is that it could easily become hacked by anyone really. Also, this money would not be seen by any kind of banks and would most likely put banks out of business. There would be no more loans, money in the banks, and there would be less money to spend. Companies borrow money from banks everyday, if that was gone, jobs would go with it. Companies will be forced to lay off and not hire. This would end up in a global depression. Whoever thought of the Bitcoin didn’t think through much of this. Though my views on these concepts may not be the most accurate and the money concept still does not have my full understanding, I now believe that money is not real. It is hard to think about that concept, and it is for anyone.

Works Cited

Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” Diss. Hoover Institution, Standford University, Feb. 1991. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.

Joffe-Walt, Chana. “How Fake Money Saved Brazil.” NPR.org. 4 Oct. 2010. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.

“The Invention of Money.” 423: The Invention of Stone Money. This Is American Life. WEBZ. Chicago. 7 Jan. 2011. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.

Renaut, Anne. “The bubble bursts on e-currency Bitcon.” Yahoo.com. 13 Apr. 3013. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.