The Choice of Shoes, a Mirror, or a Marshmallow
The Mirror of Dorian Gray:
It seems counterintuitive that a choice a person makes can define someone’s personally traits. Apparently, a certain way a person parts their hair defines some of the character traits. If it is on the left, one is most likely to be more vocal and logical. If the part is on the right side, the person is more artistic and visual. We only see our selves one way when we look in a mirror. We see exactly the opposite of what everyone else sees. One day, the author of the article, bought a special mirror. This mirror is called a True Mirror.
It is only true because the reflection is how people really see things. When someone looks into it, they can see how other people see the part in their hair or their bodies. It is mostly impossible to do anything but look into that mirror. What ever direction a person does, the mirror will show the opposite. It would be a miracle if someone completed their makeup or done their shaving right without a disaster. A man named Dorian Gray came up with this new mirror.
What Does the Marshmallow Test Actually Test?:
It seems counterintuitive that people would wait to eat a cookie, at least for me. No one could ever go wrong with cookies. But really, it’s pretty counterintuitive that a test like this can discover what kind of motivation people seem to have. That test goes like this… there was a man named Walter Mischel, and he made an experiment for his nursery-school students. The students had a couple choices in this experiment. They could choose to either, pick a treat out of a cookie, a pretzel, or a marshmallow, or if they waited 15 minutes, they can choose a forth treat. What Mischel found was that the students that actually waited those 15 minutes were over all better students. They were the more patient and motivated students than the ones who choose to pick one of the three snacks without any waiting.
A new study, and more in depth, experiment has been done by Celeste Kidd. What she did was that she took the same concept but with different age groups and with different points on interest with that age group. She used three-to-five year old for her experiment. The kids had two choices, which was to keep the dull, used crayons to draw or wait 15 minutes and use a new 24 pack. The experiment was basically split half and half, but half of them were told that there was no new pack of crayons.
Right after, Kidd tried to marshmallow experiment. More students this time decided not to wait because they figured there wasn’t going to be a new treat for them in the end. In the end, Mischel’s experiment seemed to focus more on the student’s self-control rather than determination. Kidd’s experiment focused on how the children live at home and how much logic they really have.
Do Toms Shoes Really Help People?:
It is counterintuitive that we shouldn’t trust what businesses and companies are telling us. It has been proven that the Tom’s shoe company has not been telling the full truth about giving shoes to the children of Africa. For the young Americans today, that sounds like something so saint-like, of course I want to buy a pair! I don’t want any African child with out shoes! What kind of person would I be if I didn’t buy these shoes?! A gullible person, that’s who.
In reality, the student’s of Africa already have shoes to go to school in because the schools give them shoes if they don’t. But don’t get me wrong, these children should get as many pairs as they can, like all of us have. The thing is, Tom’s is making it seem like if they don’t donate a pair of shoes, the children will be deprived of their education, which isn’t the truth. A company lying might not come as a surprise to most people because that’s how the world apparently works now-a-days, but Tom’s shoes shouldn’t get all the praise they are getting for their “charity work.”