Definition Argument- thesilentbutdeadlycineman

The Misunderstanding of Rock ‘n’ Roll

Rock ‘n’ roll is often misunderstood due to how it is commonly portrayed in our society. This genre of music is almost always associated with dark forces and the occult, which in reality, is a prime example of “judging a book by its cover”.  As an unknown writer once said, “We live in a very superficial society. It is very easy to fall into the trap of looking only at the surface of people, things, and ideas without taking the time and effort to delve deeper into them.” A seemingly unrelated topic that works nicely as an analogy for this misjudgment is the treatment of Blacks throughout history.  At its surface, Rock ‘n’ roll does show signs of being solely based around darkness. However, underneath that surface is a wide collection of songs pertaining to the most eclectic of topics. Black people are judged because of their skin color, even though they are human beings just like everyone else. Until people open their minds (or their ears), and truly pay attention to who Black people are as individuals and what Rock ‘n’ roll truly signifies, they are left with demeaning and unfair images that are nowhere near the actuality.

An in depth look into Rock ‘n’ roll shows a melting pot of widely unrelated topics, most having nothing to do with dark forces and the occult. The anti-war and anti-violence sentiment of the 60’s can be heard through songs like Creedence Clearwater Revival’s “Fortunate Son”, which attacked militant patriotic behavior and the individuals who supported the fight without getting their own hands dirty, and Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the U. S. A.”, which addresses the harmful effects that the Vietnam War had on Americans. Rock ‘n’ roll also has quite few songs about love, some coming from bands that would not normally be associated with the theme- including “Forever” by Kiss (which details a man’s realization that his love for a certain girl will last forever), and “Sweet Child O’ Mine” by Guns N’ Roses (which was inspired by a poem band mate Axl Rose wrote about his girlfriend at the time). And one of the best proofs that Rock ‘n’ roll was not centered on darkness is a little song by Jimmy Buffet called, “Cheeseburger in Paradise”. This song has no double meaning, and is entirely about a man’s love for cheeseburgers. There is absolutely nothing dark forces in it, which can be said for a majority of Rock ‘n’ roll songs.

The misunderstanding of Rock ‘n’ roll can be paralleled with the unfair treatment of Blacks throughout history.  Opinion on them is commonly based on their skin color instead of who they are as a person. Take Solomon Northup, the free African- American who had to endure twelve years as a slave. As a few writers from the Encyclopedia Britannica have said, “Solomon received some education and worked on his family’s farm as a child. He married Anne Hampton in 1828. In 1834, after selling their farm, the couple moved to Saratoga Springs, New York, where they worked odd jobs to support their three children. Northup also established a reputation as a talented fiddler.” Contrary to the popular belief of the time that African-Americans were savages and naturally inferior to White Americans, Solomon Northup was a hard worker who was able to create a mostly stable lifestyle for his family, and even became a renown musician. Unfortunately, he was lured by two men who judged him based off of his skin to travel to Washington DC, where he was drugged and sold into slavery. For the next twelve years he worked as a slave for different masters, who did not believe that he was a free and educated African-American. He was being judged by his skin, not his true self. After finally securing his freedom, Northup ended up writing his memoir, which revealed to the world his side of the story. Another Black individual who was much more than he appeared to be on the outside was Thomas-Alexandre Dumas. The father of famed writer Alexandre Dumas, Thomas-Alexandre Dumas defied expectations and led an adventure of a life. As Tom Reiss, author of The Black Count: Glory, Revolution, Betrayal and the Real Count of Monte Cristo, says in an  interview with NPR’s Scott Simon , “He’s a black man, born into slavery, and then he rises higher than any black man rose in a white society before our own time,” and that, “He became a four-star general and challenges Napoleon, and he did it all 200 years ago, at the height of slavery.” In a time when Blacks were commonly found to be slaves, this one man was able to break expectations by becoming a respected general for the French army. And although his life story ended in an unfortunate manner, thanks in part to a ploy by Napoleon (who disliked Dumas for being successful and the opposite of him physically) to get rid of him, Dumas’ influence lived on, especially through some of his son’s most popular characters, such as Edmond Dantès and the musketeer d’Artagnan. Both Solomon Northup and Thomas-Alexandre Dumas highlight the “judging of a book by its cover” that took place in history,  which in turn mirrors the misunderstanding of Rock ‘n’ roll.

Rock ‘n’ roll is a Black person enduring the negative biases of people of different skin color. It is a misunderstood genre of music, incorrectly portrayed in society. And at its most basic level, Rock ‘n’ Roll is a book judged by its cover.

Works Cited

New Source Cole, Rachel, David Fiske, Rachel Seligman, and Clifford Brown. “Solomon Northup.” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 20 Nov. 2016.

New Source Simon, Scott, and Tom Reiss. “‘The Black Count,’ A Hero On The Field, And The Page.” NPR. NPR, n.d. Web. 21 Nov. 2016.

Unknown. “Don’t Judge a Book By Its Cover.” Modern Day Adages. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Oct. 2016.

 

 

 

White Paper- thesilentbutdeadlycineman

The White Paper

Content Descriptions

  • Why do preachers/dissenters dislike  Rock ‘n’ roll

Top 10 reasons why God hates rock music. – The Landover Baptist …

Rock ‘n’roll highlights values against what is taught in religion.

RELIGIOUS ROCK… The music of devils in the CHURCH

“We are told by the religious rockers that we must look and sound like the world in order to reach the youth of this generation. They say, many young people will not listen to the gospel or come to church so we must meet them on some common ground. That common ground is rock and roll. In other words, they are saying that preaching of the Word of God is no longer sufficient for both young and old. If this is true, then we should open bars in order to reach the multitudes of drinkers. We should open porno-shops in order to reach those who engage in smut. Shouldn’t we go to their level so we can bring them to the Lord Jesus Christ?”

  • Denouncing Rock’ n’ roll for invoking dark forces

The Satanic Roots of Rock Music – Jesus is Savior

The influence of dark forces on Rock music, as detailed by a religious individual.

  • What Rock ‘n’ roll represents, according to non dissenters

History of Rock & Roll – Shmoop

“The songs and the sounds we call “rock and roll” evolved from many different sources, in many different regions, and at many different moments in twentieth- century history. The music was shaped—and continues to be molded and transformed—by countless regular people, some doing what they love, others seeking refuge from what they hate, some hoping to change the world, and still others resisting what they fear.”

  • A look at the Civil Rights movement (that bring in mind the argument concerning Rock ‘n’ roll)

Find evidence of mistreatment of African-Americans, and highlight racist beliefs and where they stem from. Will be used to connect to prejudice against Rock ‘n’ roll.

A brief history of racism in the United States | SoundVision.com

  • A look at the eclectic topics of Rock ‘n’ roll music

Cheeseburger in Paradise by Jimmy Buffett Songfacts

Brief description as to why Jimmy Buffet decided to write a song about cheeseburgers.

Fortunate Son Meaning – Shmoop

Detailing how Creedence Clearwater wrote an anti-war/ anti- violence song about the Vietnam conflict.

  • Illustrate the argument that rock musicians have used dark forces sometime in their careers, including those that seemed like they would never be involved with the dark forces

“Too Drunk To Karaoke” Hit Song Mocks God – Jesus is Savior

Jimmy Buffet, along with Toby Keith, glorify being drunk, which is highly sinful.

  • Explaining “don’t judge a book by its cover” (optional)

Don’t Judge a Book By Its Cover – MIT

“We live in a very superficial society. It is very easy to fall into the trap of looking only at the surface of people, things, and ideas without taking the time and effort to delve deeper into them.”

“Only by looking at the less obvious features can we know what is truly the most outstanding person, object, or idea. And then we will know it with confidence.”

Working Hypotheses

Working Hypothesis 1

Rock’n’ roll does not gain its popularity from invoking dark forces, as some preachers tend to claim.

Working Hypothesis 2

The popular saying,”don’t judge a book by its cover,” can be illustrated by the common  misinterpretation of Rock ‘n’ roll.

Topics for Smaller Papers

Definition/ Classification Argument

Explain how Rock ‘n’ roll is misunderstood, offering clear examples to show its variety. Also connect the argument to the civil rights movement, where the black citizens argued that they should not be unfairly judged due to their outward appearance (instead of how they are as people).

Cause/Effect Argument

Analyze the reasons why preachers and general rock dissenters have condemned the popular type of music. What caused them to preach against Rock ‘n’ roll?

Rebuttal Argument

Attack the argument that rock is centered on an eclectic amount of topics, by highlighting the fact that many of the rock artists who may have written music about various things have had history invoking dark forces, in one way or another.

Current State of Research

So far, I believe that I have laid a loose groundwork of where my paper could go. My personal opinions have not yet changed concerning the argument, but my focus for the hypothesis is not as narrow-minded. I can now better understand where the counterargument is stemming from, and how much variety can be included under Rock’n’ roll, why still being able to relate to other misunderstood topics in history. I hope that the eventual outcome is that I am able to produce a mostly coherent and interesting paper, that will bridge together multiple little topics under one big hypothesis. I want both sides of the argument to be understood and relatable to the reader (even though the paper is supporting mainly one side). I still can “dump” a whole lot more outside information that may help my paper as well.

Polio Notes- thesilentbutdeadlycineman

  • Polio requires the vaccination of children between the age of 0-5, because immune system is not strong enough, and they are generally dirty. Goes through mouth and then comes out through poop.
  • Polio always comes through the mouth, making it very common in children.
  • Polio used to be a global problem until the 70s and 80s, when inexpensive and effective vaccines had successfully eradicate the virus on 99% of the world.
  • Once polio is totally eradicated, it will be gone forever.
  • Armed conflicts stifle the eradication of polio due to unsanitary nature.
  • Polio is easy to spread, unless the population is vaccinated and careful, and sanitary.
  • Endemic polio is only India, Afganistan, Syria,and Nigeria.
  • About 100 cases of polio now
  • In Nigeria, in Khano, there was a rumor that vaccine contained pork, which came from the idea that the live virus used the growth medium connected to bone marrow of pigs. Months later, cases of polio broke out.
  • People from Khano then traveled to Lagos, where the population was much bigger. Soon enough, Nigeria had polio.
  • In Pakistan, US though Bin Laden was hiding there. Brought a polio eradication team (who were secretly CIA spies) to find Bin Laden, which they eventually did. Now, if another polio team would come, the people will refuse the vaccination, as they will believe that the team is actually more spies.
  • In India, on the same day, beginning in places where the liquid vaccine is kept cold (which needs to be administered in three doses of 2-3 drops on the tongue),WHO gets a lot of volunteers to go to many villages and find children and give them the vaccines. Now, there are only 9-10 cases of Polio per year.
  • Cost is one big factor of why not everyone has received a vaccine. Laziness is also another factor.
  • When a virus hasn’t been seen for a generation, people stop caring and vaccinating, until the virus comes back because of 1%, causing those same people to be clueless as what to do now.
  • Polio shuts down the body and causes major paralysis.

Practice Opening

Polio is very easy to spread, but also very easy to eradicate. All it takes for the disease to stop spreading is to apply two to three drops of the vaccine on people’s tongues on three different occasions, and a generally sanitary environment. And if polio, which is spread through people’s mouths, is totally eradicated, it will never return. However, even though our world is about 99% safe from polio, there is still the 1% that can restart a major outbreak. Due to factors such as the cost of the vaccine, unsanitary nature of the environments, and general laziness, places like Afghanistan, India, Syria, and Nigeria are still battling a fluctuating number of polio cases. If this polio ever returns to the United States, we  will most likely not know how to deal with it properly, as we haven’t had to combat it since we had previously  stopped it over a generation ago. With all this in mind, the likelihood that polio will be completely eradicated in the next 20 years is slim to none.

 

Safer Saws-thesilentbutdeadlycineman

The Battle to Make Table Saws Safer

Manufacturers- Saw Stop

A.Our saws, besides being the highest quality and best featured saws in their market segments, feature the ability to detect contact with skin and stop the blade in less than 5 milliseconds.

B. The claim is explaining that SawStop’s saws are the best in their market segments, and that they contain a unique feature to protect the users.

C. The type of claim being made is factual. Everything that the company says about their saws is presented as facts.

D. Yes, SawStop’s saws do have the unique ability, but what evidence is there to show that those saws are also the highest quality and best featured in their market segments? The main focus of the manufacturer in the entire note that featured this claim was really about how the saws had a feature like no other. Outside of this claim, there is never a mention or proof that the saws are also the best all around.

Customers- Peter A. Surette; Middleton, MA about the Jobsite saw

A.First table saw I’ve ever purchased since all the others I’ve seen posed a significant risk to my livelihood.

B. The claim explains that the customer chose to buy the Jobsite saw as his first saw over all the other choices, as it won’t injure him as bad as the majority.

C. The type of claim being made is opinion. The customer is saying why he chose the saw he bought.

D. The claim is over exaggerating the danger that may come from other saws, which is exactly what the customer seemed intent on doing. He is trying to explain why he chose the Jobsite saw over the others in a humorous way. The customer is persuading new customers to consider the SawStop saw in a manner that seems very casual and friendlike.

 Industry Spokespeople-Susan Young, who represents Black & Decker, Bosch, Makita and other power tool companies

A.Young says many consumers won’t want to pay for the SawStop technology, which could add $100 to $300 in cost, depending on which side you talk to.

B. The claim is saying that many customers will not want to pay extra money for the SawStop technology to be included with the saws.

C. The type of claim being made is factual. Young is saying as a fact that due to the extra cost, people won’t want to buy the technology.

D. How do we know that the technology could add $100 to $300 in cost? What are the two sides that we may talk to? This industry spokesperson says that consumers will not want to pay for this technology, and yet, many of these consumers are the ones demanding for the addition of the safety technology, as they have gotten injured by normal table saws. So, I don’t think consumers will be opposed to paying some extra cash in order to work safer.

Customer Safety Advocates – National Consumer League

A.Approximately 40,000 Americans go to hospital emergency rooms every year with injuries sustained while operating table saws.  About 4,000 of those injuries – or more than 10 every day – are amputations.

B. The claim explains that about a tenth of the injuries suffered from table saws are amputations.

C. The type of claim being made is factual. It is giving the specific number of Americans injured by table saws, and the number of amputees from the same source.

D. Outside of the amputations, what are the other types of injuries coming from table saws? How were these statistics acquired (based off what)?

Injured Plaintiffs- A Man Injured by a Table Saw

A.The plaintiff is demanding more than $30,000 from Bosch for negligence, breach of warranty and product liability. 

B. The claim explains that a person injured by a table saw is suing Bosch for negligence, breach of warranty and product liability concerning the product.

C. The type of claim being made is factual. The plaintiff is saying frankly that his injury was because of negligence, breach of warranty, and product liability. It is also a fact that he has decided to sue the company more than $30000.

D. How does the man believe that the company was negligent in their table saws? How did the man injuring himself breach the warranty of the saw? What does product liability have to do with the matter? Basically, this claim does not explain why the plaintiff chose to sue in those specific categories. Also, how did he come up with $30,000 or more as the amount that he is suing?

Personal Injury Lawyers- The Schmidt Firm, PLLC

A.People who have lost fingers, hands, and arms to table saws have been devastated by their injuries.

B. The claim explains that people who have been injured by table saws are left in  bad situations due to their injuries.

C. The type of claim being made is factual. The argument is presented to the reader as straight up facts.

D. Why and how have people with table saw injuries become devastated? How many people out of a greater number have been devastated? While not necessarily needed, it would be nice to know what type of people most commonly acquire these injuries.

Government Officials- Chairman Inez M. Tenebaum of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

A.To these victims and to all of the other victims who have suffered life-altering injuries from table saws, I want you to know that your efforts to improve the safety of these tools have made a difference.

B. The claim is the Chairman letting the victims of saw-related injuries know that their efforts to improve the tools’ safety mechanisms are making a difference.

C. The type of claim being made is proposal. The Chairman is appealing to the victims by letting them know that their worries are and will be dealt with.

D. The Chairman says that the victims’ efforts have made a difference in improving the safety of the tools. However, this appears to be just an excuse to quiet the complaining. Based off other articles on the entire matter,no difference has really happened. In fact, as seen in one transcript,it appears as if the U.S. Consumer Product Commission is actually stalling on reaching a decision. The major companies have not adopted the SawStop technology (or something similar), and people are still very much getting injured.

News Reporters-Clint DeBoer of Protool Reviews

A.So Bosch apparently doesn’t want to be under a law that would double the price of many of their saws, require expensive safety devices on miter saws (which really don’t need them) and force them (and all other manufacturers) to pay royalties to a monopolistic single license holder of the SawStop technology… I wouldn’t either.

B. The claim is the reporter saying that he has the same mindset as Bosch, as both wouldn’t want to be a law that regulated the way business was being done.

C. The type of claim being made is opinion. The reporter can clearly be seen adding his own views to the argument.

D. So the law would supposedly rise the price of the Bosch saws, which the company does not want. However, these saws are rising in price because they will be including the SawStop, which will prevent more injuries from happening. And as previously mentioned, customers are willing to pay more in order to be safer. So in the end, Bosch would actually be making more money under the new law. The reporter says that the saws don’t really need the expensive safety devices that would become a requirement under the new law. And yet, there are so many customers who have been injured by these saws, that it is almost completely evident that these cutting tools need better safety mechanisms. The reporter also claims that the law will force these big companies to pay royalties to the single license holder of the SawStop technology. I am not sure a law will force the big companies to use one specific product. I believe the law will just require these manufacturers to include some type of safety mechanism similar to SawStop (or the brand version if they are willing to pay as much for it).  If the law, however, did require the big companies to pay royalties to SawStop, then okay. The little safety technology manufacturer deserves to make more money, and I don’t think that the royalties will make the big companies lose  that much money.

Visual Rewrite- thesilentbutdeadlycineman

Describing What Happens in Get The Cure

0:01-0:05– The ad seems to be shot in the style of the Cops TV show (handheld camera operated by a cameraman following individuals in their usual activities). The cameraman is sitting in the middle seat of the back row of a car. As the ad begins, the only person visible on the screen is an average-looking, somewhat-overweight, middle-aged white man in a lab coat sitting in the front passenger seat of the car. The vehicle itself is rolling slowly through a deserted city alleyway during the middle of the night. The only light visible is coming from the car’s headlights, the outside streetlamps, and the camera’s personal light. While motioning his hands towards the view apparent through the front window, the man faces the camera and makes a remark about the general area’s current state, and how it is a mess, with a bunch of polyps running around. This mentioning of polyps is the first clue that the men are doctors.

0:06-0:09– All of a sudden a man dressed in a pink Hershey’s Kiss-shaped costume casually walks in front of the headlights a few feet from where the car is. He briefly stops in shock, like a deer caught in the headlights of a truck, before deciding to run further down the alley. The man in the passenger man quickly indicates that the costumed man is a polyp.   The driver, seen only by his hands and white lab coat, quickly places the car in Park. A siren coming from the car is heard, indicating that it is most likely an ambulance (further supporting the assumption that the men are doctors). Both the man in the passengers’ seat and the driver jump out of the car.  The passenger man can be heard grunting in frustration in having to pursue the costumed individual. At the same time, the camera man jerks to the right, showing him opening the door and running out to follow the action.

0:10-0:15– The shaky camera (due to the cameraman trying to keep up) shows the two men in the lab coats run furiously in the dim light after the man in the funny pink suit, similar to cops trying to catch a man attempting to evade arrest. This is an indication that he is a threat, as he doesn’t even try to cooperate with pursuers. In relation to the environment, the costumed man doesn’t seem to pose much of a threat yet, as he doesn’t appear very athletic or intimidating. Soon enough, the two men are able to capture the costumed person as he is trying to climb up a wired fence. They pull him off and tackle him on top of a pile of garbage bags and cardboard boxes.

0:16-0: 23– As the cameraman in walking backwards, the audience watches as the two men drag the costumed man by the arms back to the car. The audience can now see that the man looks like a stereotypical nerd with a slightly chubby face and thick glasses. He is in a giant pink spandex onesie  that looks like a cross between a chubby red Teletubbie and the aforementioned Hershey’s Kiss (in shape). The costumed man, as he is being dragged back to the car, is yelling around, and unsuccessfully trying to escape (in a manner that makes him look like he is a drunk person trying to walk straight).

0:24-0:26– The ad then switches to a white information screen with red words that read, “colon cancer. get the test. get the polyp. get the cure.” Below the words on each bottom corner of the screen, it is shown that the ad is produced by Ad Council, and sponsored by The American Cancer Society (both accompanied by their respective logos). Finally in the bottom middle of the screen, red words can be seen saying,  “1-800-ACS-2345 or cancer.org”. It can be assumed that the men in the car are performing a colonoscopy (the test), where they get the polyp (costumed man), thereby preventing any more trouble in the colon (the alley).

0:27-0:28– The ad quickly jumps back to the main action, where the costumed man (polyp) is shouting out to the camera, while being pushed into the backseat of the ambulance by the two men in lab coats (the doctors) with great effort. The “doctors” have successfully removed the “polyp” from the “colon”.

0:29-0:31– Finally, the ad returns to the information screen in order to reiterate the point, before fading to black.

Get The Cure | Colon Cancer Prevention | Ad Council

Missing Dollar-thesilentbutdeadlycineman

There has never been a missing dollar. The situation says that each woman paid $10 for a bill of $30. The cashier then reveals that the actual bill is $25, and gives the waiter five $1 bills to return to the women. The waiter keeps $2 and returns to each woman a $1 bill.

So now the bill is $25. Since each woman was given back $1, they each ended up paying $9, for a total of $27. From this total, the waiter took $2 for himself, bringing the total down to the $25.

Each woman originally paid $10 for a total of $30. They were later given back each $1 in return, bringing the total to $27. With this new total, the women each had to have paid $9. However, the actual bill is still $25, meaning that they have still overpaid. To solve the problem, the waiter takes $2 for himself, causing the total down to the bill’s amount.

“Now, each of the ladies paid $9. Three times 9 is $27. The waiter has $2 in his pocket. Two plus 27 is $29. The ladies originally handed over $30.” It is the wording of these sentences that confuses readers. With each woman being given back $1, each woman has now paid $9, meaning that the adjusted total is now $27 (something these sentences do not specify). The $2 from the waiter’s pocket is from the $27, and therefore cannot be added to that total. The new adjusted total after the waiter’s removal is $25, which is exactly what the bill needed.

Here is math to illustrate my point one final time:

$10 + $10 + $10 = $30 (original bill)

$25 (real bill)

$30 – $5 = $25          

$5= $1+ $1+ $1+ $1+ $1

Woman 1: $1     Woman 2: $1   Woman 3: $1

$10 – $1= $9

$9 + $9+ $9= $27 (adjusted total)           $30- $1$1$1 =$27

Waiter: $1 + $1

$27 – $1$1 = $25

The restaurant has $25 which is what the real bill required ($25).

Basically, there is no missing dollar.

 

 

Open Strong- thesilentbutdeadlycineman

Opening 1:

Satan, dark magic, violence, and anarchy  are not true defining characteristics of Rock ‘n’roll. The real purpose of the sweet music is to honor and spread the teachings of God and of deities from other religions.  In our culture, it is commonly believed that Rock is entirely centered on the Occult. And while album covers and they way that certain performers behave seemingly confirm this, this belief is not really correct. In a closer look at the genre of music, it is apparent that many popular performers are actually very spiritual, their ideologies seeping into their beloved songs. Moreover, many of the musicians who release what is believed to be Occultist music are actually honoring religion in a counterintuitive manner. This overall idea might seem like it has emerged out of nowhere, but at look at the origins of Rock’n’ roll will show otherwise.

Opening 2:

Rock ‘n’ roll is a way to honor God and the various deities of other religions. Commonly believed as a conduit for Satan and the Occult, Rock is very much the opposite.  Rock performers and their songs are actually very spiritual, sometimes using the appearance of the Occult in a counterintuitive manner. This idea might seem out of the blue and without substantial support, but a closer look into the music genre will provide all the proof needed. And the logical first step in this investigation are the origins of Rock ‘n’ roll, where religion very much played a part.

thesilentbutdeadlycineman’s Proposal

Rock ‘n’ Roll…and God

The Pitch…

My hypothesis is that the Rock’n’Roll did not rely on the Occult or invoke the Devil, but instead had a focus on honoring the Christian God and the various deities of other religions.

It is a common belief that Rock performers would immerse themselves in the world of the Occult, and tried to spread their messages of violence, sex, and anarchy. Album covers and the way that these artists behave seemingly support this. However, there are clear indications of just the opposite- Rock is used as a way to invoke religion and its various teachings. Many popular Rock performers are actually very spiritual, which can be seen in some of the most well-regarded tunes. Through Rock, the word of God is actually spread to  young listeners who do not attend church regularly . And in fact, many of the songs that are commonly thought to honor Satan and dark magic are actually warnings against such ideas. In this research paper, I will go against popular belief, and illustrate a point of view of Rock’n’roll that makes much more sense than what is currently thought.

 

…+ 5 Sources

Top 10 Quotes About Rock and Religion – Ultimate Classic Rock

  • The Essential Content of the Article: A top 10 list of well known Rock musicians providing quotes about their personal relations with religion, and how it crosses over to their music.
  • What it Proves: Some of the most popular Rock performers are very much into religion and spirituality. Shows that a majority of Rock stars do not worship the Devil and the occult.

God, Love, and Rock n’ Roll – CBN.com

  • The Essential Content of the Article: Rock is another way for God to spread his messages. His messages were given through various ways in order to capture the attention of specific crowds, whether by types of music or specific people (such as John the Baptist, a relatively disheveled man who was able to attract many people with his words and actions).
  • What it Proves: That there can absolutely be the presence of God in Rock music. Rock’n’roll, although seemingly unorthodox to conservative Christians, still spreads the messages of religion to groups of individuals who do not identify with the classical form of learning scriptures.

The Top 10 Epic Rock Songs Featuring Jesus Christ – VH1.com

  • The Essential Content of the Article: A top 10 list of beloved Rock songs that mentioned Jesus Christ and religion in their lyrics, including Norman Greenbaum‘s “Spirit in The Sky” and The Doobie Brothers‘ “Jesus Is Just Alight”.
  • What it Proves: That some of the most popular Rock tunes had to do with religion, casting it in a good light. Shows that God can be associated to Rock. From this point I will also mention the fact that “Spirit in The Sky” is one of the most requested songs at funerals.

Tracing It to Its Origins – Inside Rock Music

  • The Essential Content of the Article: An analysis of the origins of Rock music, and how at its basic roots, it was all about offering tribute to well known deities. Also mentions how early performers invoked these deities, and attempted to spread the ideas to the millions of listeners.
  • What it Proves: Religion has always had a place in Rock music. For example,Voodoo, which was very popular with Rock performers, may appear to be a  big representative of the Occult, but in reality, the word is derived from the African term vodun, which is translated as deities that speak through humans.

Japanese Buddhist and Lutheran Pastors Spreading God Through Rock

  • The Essential Content of the Article: Japanese Pastor Kazuhiro Sekino and his band Boxi Rocks, along with Monk Yoshinobu Fujioka and his band Bozu, spread the word of God and happiness to hundreds of audience members through fun Rock music.
  • What it Proves: A prime example of how religion and Rock can blend very well, and how this combination successfully spreads the good word of the Lord to multitudes of young people and non churchgoers. Shows that Rock is not entirely about spreading messages of anarchy, sex, and blasphemy.

E03: Critical Reading- thesilentbutdeadlycineman

Analyzing Some PTSD Claims from the Article
“Is PTSD Contagious?”

“In 2006, the British Ministry of Defence pardoned some 300 soldiers who had been executed for cowardice and desertion during World War I, having concluded that many were probably just crippled by PTSD.”

  • Some 300 soldiers out of how many?
  •  Although it can be guessed that they belong to Britain, the article doesn’t explicitly indicate that the pardoned soldiers were from that country.
  • How could the British Ministry of Defence tell which of the many soldiers actually suffered from PTSD, and which were very much cowards and deserters?
  • “Probably just crippled by PTSD” is not a strong conclusion. There is no indication that the Ministry actually did any scientific research to come to this general conclusion. How did they decide that PTSD was the probable cause?
  • This doesn’t completely have to do with the comment, but I would like to know how the country dealt with soldiers suffering from PTSD during World War II.

” Granted, diagnosing PTSD is a tricky thing. The result of a malfunctioning nervous system that fails to normalize after trauma and instead perpetrates memories and misfires life-or-death for no practical reason, it comes in a couple of varieties, various complexities, has causes ranging from one lightning fast event to drawn-out terrors or patterns of abuse- in soldiers, the incidence of PTSD goes up with the number of tours experienced.”

  •  Based ON how many soldiers has the incidence of PTSD gone up with the number of experienced tours?
  • Having the words “varieties” and “various,” both of which are spanning from the same root meaning, bothers me.
  • The author is saying that it is hard to get any conclusive information about PTSD. And yet they finish by factually saying that soldiers experience PTSD based ON the number of tours they have.
  • What are the “couple of varieties,” “various complexities,” and “causes”? I would like specific examples to illustrate the point!

“The Army has rules about that sort of thing now. Now if you’re knocked unconscious, or have double vision, or exhibit other signs of a brain injury, you have to rest for a certain period of time, but that rule didn’t go into effect in theater until 2010, after Caleb was already out of the service.”

  • The author says that the Army has rules pertaining to a traumatic brain injury, and yet right after, they only state one rule-“to rest for a certain period of time.”
  • “to rest for a certain period of time,” is the best that the Army could come up with to deal with a traumatic brain injury?
  • Having one sentence end in “now,” and another begin with “Now” right next to each other bothers me.
  • What was the Army recommending the soldiers do for brain injuries before 2010?
  • What does “didn’t go into effect in theater” mean? Is it a synonym to “taking center stage”?

“In one study, the incidence of secondary trauma in wives of Croatian war vets with PTSD was 30 percent. In another study there, it was 39 percent.”

  • How many wives took part in the studies?
  • How were both studies different? Did they use a different number of wives? Were the studies conducted by different institutions? Why is there such a difference in the percentages?

“I asked the lead scientist, Marinus van IJzendoorn of Leiden University, what might account for other studies’ finding of secondary trauma in vets’ spouses or kids. He said he’s never analyzed those studies, and wonders if the result would hold up to a meta-analysis.”

  • Why include the lead scientist in the argument when he hasn’t analyzed the studies pertaining to it?!
  • As a lead scientist in this field of study, shouldn’t he have already taken note of every possible related factor, and had pretty researched answers as to why they take place?

“Holocaust survivors ‘had more resources and networks, wider family members and community to support them to adapt to their new circumstances after a war.’ They were not, in other words, expected to man up and get over it.”

  • I am no history major, but weren’t most of the Holocaust survivors Jewish, who after the war, had to learn that most of their brethren and families had perished during that harsh period of time? What wide family members and community were there after the war? I believe that most of the survivors found themselves alone after all the fighting had ended.
  • How focused were the Allied powers on helping out the Holocaust survivors? I would think that they would be more focused on giving Germany some punishment and dealing with issues much greater than taking care of Holocaust survivors (much like how veterans were treated after they returned to the US following World War I). Basically, the survivors were expected to “man up and get over it.”

Stone Money Rewrite- thesilentbutdeadlycineman

The Not-So-Absurd Idea of Stone Money

 

A couple of days ago, if anyone were to ask me what was the concept of money, I would have told them that it is a way to buy or sell items. I would also add that here in the United States, our money comes in the form of individual dollar bills and little metallic coins. The more a person possesses of these forms of money, the richer they are. This country’s current society believes in this concept, accepting it as pretty straightforward. However, the reality is that money is a concept so abstract, that it can either be represented by green paper bills or unmovable stone circles, and still work in the same way.

So what is the true concept of money? Well, as A. Freeman says, “Money is primarily a medium of exchange or means of exchange. It is a way for a person to trade what he has for what he wants.” This is similar to what I previously thought, and is in a sense true. However, it does not explain the whole truth. As Ira Glass reveals in the podcast The Invention of Money, “Money is fiction… money never existed… No money changed hands, no money vanished… Money is not solid. Its value could disappear.” There is the answer- money is not real. It is an abstract concept used as a medium of exchange or means of exchange and whose value may change. And the money is worth a certain amount because everyone accepts said amount or value. To illustrate this point, let’s travel to a little island called Yap, on which massive unmovable stone currency was used.

In his article titled The Island Of Stone Money, author Milton Friedman features a quote  by American anthropologist William Henry Furness III about the inhabitants of Yap and their currency, which states, “Their medium of exchange is called the fei, and it consists of large, solid, thick, stone wheels…After concluding a bargain which involves the price of a fei too large to be conveniently moved, its new owner is quite content to accept the bare acknowledgment of ownership and without so much as a mark to indicate the exchange, the coin remains undisturbed on the former owner’s premises.” Money on Yap is represented by these stone wheels, and the transfer of money for purchase is accepted through word of mouth, without these wheels actually moving. Everyone on this island trusts an individual when they say that they have earned the neighbor’s stone in exchange for a service. The word of mouth process is accepted, and the idea of lying about the ownership of a stone is generally out of the picture. A popular example of this is a story about a group of individuals who were transporting a huge stone wheel on their ship from one point of the island to another. En route, a storm broke out, causing the stone to sink to the bottom of the ocean. Once the group were able to safely return back to land, they told the people they encountered that they were carrying a massive stone wheel and that it is at the bottom of the ocean. The listeners accepted this account as fact, without seeing any proof, and offered items to the individuals based off how much they believed the stone was worth.  The actual money is never really there, but through representation of stones and accepted word of mouth, the inhabitants of Yap had a working currency system. In fact, the way we use money today is not too different from those of the islanders.

Instead of giant stone wheels, we use green pieces of paper, metallic circles, plastic rectangles, and numbers on electronic boxes in order to represent and transfer our money. Instead of accepting word of mouth (most of the time), we use quantity and numbers to show the amount of wealth in our possession. Even with that minor difference, the idea stays the same- and the “actual” money never appears. In our society, as an anonymous author points out in their article titled Money and the Illusion of Wealth, “Over 90% of money is literally created out of thin air via loans and the expectation of debt repayment.” We say that something is so amount, and expect someone else to be able to pay us back with something else of similar value. We are literally picking a monetary price that others generally accept as fact. This is what Ira Glass meant when he said that, “Money is fiction.” Money doesn’t exist, but we believe that it does based off what we use to represent it and how much an individual has of those representations. Think about how most working class individuals are being paid nowadays. People are not given a check or cash for a certain number of hours worked anymore. They instead find out that they have been paid based off what they read as the available balanced in their bank account. How do they know that money has actually been transferred to their account, however? All that is apparent to them is that a couple of numbers related to their bank account have risen in value on the computer screen in front of them. People accept these little digital numbers as proof that they have more money in their possession, even though they have never physically had any contact with said money. The dollars never existed, but have been represented by the numbers. Hence, money is fiction, even in our society.

In the initial paragraph, I made it clear that if someone were to question me on the concept of money and how it works, I would have given a straightforward answer about how it is the way we as a society purchase and sell items, mainly through the form of dollar bills and coins. Now I realize how narrow minded I was at the time. As I have now shown, and as I have personally learned in the past couple of days, money is a concept much more abstract. Yes, it is used as a means of buying and selling. But money also doesn’t exist. We made it up out of nowhere, decided to use different things in order to represent it, chose how much any given item was worth, and finally accepted everything as fact. Based off this truth, instead of pieces of paper, plastic, metal, and digital information, we should be able to theoretically accept anything as money. Why not use live animals?  Why not use other human beings ? (as history has sadly and unfortunately shown). Why not use our own body hair to represent currency? (though I guess my hairless father wouldn’t be too happy). Perhaps we could follow the footsteps of another successful and trustworthy civilization and use Stone Money.

 

Works Cited

Anonymous, Author. “Money and the Illusion of Wealth.” Money and the Illusion of                                 Wealth. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.

Freeman, A. “What Is Money?” Economics and Liberty. N.p., 11 Dec. 2015. Web. 13                                   Sept. 2016.

Friedman, Milton. “The Island Of Stone Money.” (n.d.): n. pag. Web. 13 Sept. 2016.

Glass, Ira, and Planet Money. “The Invention of Money.” This American Life. N.p.,                                   n.d. Web. 13 Sept. 2016